|
51%
Micromax Bolt A82
₹3,238
(Discontinued)
|
M-Tech Opal Q9
₹3,750
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Micromax Bolt A82 vs M-Tech Opal Q9
Comparing the Micromax Bolt A82 vs M-Tech Opal Q9 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Micromax Bolt A82 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while M-Tech Opal Q9 runs at 1.2 GHz, making Micromax Bolt A82 the better performer.
Display: Micromax Bolt A82 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while M-Tech Opal Q9 offers 4 inches, making Micromax Bolt A82 the larger display of the two. Both Micromax Bolt A82 and M-Tech Opal Q9 feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Both Micromax Bolt A82 and M-Tech Opal Q9 feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: M-Tech Opal Q9 offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while Micromax Bolt A82 offers 0.3 MP, making M-Tech Opal Q9 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Micromax Bolt A82 offers a higher battery capacity with 1800 mAh, while M-Tech Opal Q9 offers 1400 mAh, making Micromax Bolt A82 better for longer battery life.
Storage: M-Tech Opal Q9 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Micromax Bolt A82 offers 4 GB, making M-Tech Opal Q9 the better option for storage.
|
✕
Micromax Bolt A82
₹3,238
(Discontinued)
|
✕
M-Tech Opal Q9
₹3,750
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
51%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
18 Feb, 2015
|
29 Sep, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
|
480x854 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
1.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1800 mAh
|
1400 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
196 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
56.79 %
|
Design
Height
|
N/A
|
124.8 mm
|
Width
|
N/A
|
64.2 mm
|
Thickness
|
N/A
|
10.8 mm
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
Other
480x854x30 fps |
N/A
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1800 mAh
|
1400 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v2.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Accelerometer
|