|
57%
Micromax Bolt Q335
₹4,100
(Discontinued)
|
Celkon Millennia Q452
₹4,399
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Micromax Bolt Q335 vs Celkon Millennia Q452
Comparing the Micromax Bolt Q335 vs Celkon Millennia Q452 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Micromax Bolt Q335 and Celkon Millennia Q452 run at the same processing speed of 1.2 GHz.
Display: Both Micromax Bolt Q335 and Celkon Millennia Q452 offer the same screen size of 4.5 inches, but Celkon Millennia Q452 features a IPS LCD display compared to Micromax Bolt Q335's TFT, making Celkon Millennia Q452 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Micromax Bolt Q335 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Celkon Millennia Q452 offers 3.2 MP, making Micromax Bolt Q335 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Micromax Bolt Q335 offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Celkon Millennia Q452 offers 0.3 MP, making Micromax Bolt Q335 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Micromax Bolt Q335 offers a higher battery capacity with 1650 mAh, while Celkon Millennia Q452 offers 1500 mAh, making Micromax Bolt Q335 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Celkon Millennia Q452 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Micromax Bolt Q335 offers 4 GB, making Celkon Millennia Q452 the better option for storage.
|
Micromax Bolt Q335
₹4,100
(Discontinued)
|
Celkon Millennia Q452
₹4,399
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
57%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
25 May, 2015
|
12 Aug, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Spreadtrum SC7731
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x854 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1650 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.6/5
(587 ratings)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Spreadtrum SC7731
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
218 ppi
|
218 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
62.84 %
|
Design
Height
|
N/A
|
133.5 mm
|
Width
|
N/A
|
66.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
N/A
|
9.5 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
129 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary CameraCMOS image sensor |
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2048 x 1536 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Digital image stabilization Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1650 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|