Micromax CG666 vs Reliance ZTE Q301C
Comparing the Micromax CG666 vs Reliance ZTE Q301C across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Reliance ZTE Q301C runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Micromax CG666 runs at 0.19 GHz, making Reliance ZTE Q301C the better performer.
Display: Reliance ZTE Q301C offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Micromax CG666 offers 2.4 inches, making Reliance ZTE Q301C the larger display of the two. Reliance ZTE Q301C features a LCD display compared to Micromax CG666's TFT, making Reliance ZTE Q301C the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Reliance ZTE Q301C offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Micromax CG666 offers 0.3 MP, making Reliance ZTE Q301C better for rear camera photography.
Battery: Micromax CG666 offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while Reliance ZTE Q301C offers 1650 mAh, making Micromax CG666 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Reliance ZTE Q301C offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while Micromax CG666 offers 256 GB, making Reliance ZTE Q301C the better option for storage.
User Rating: Micromax CG666 receives a higher user rating of 3.4, while Reliance ZTE Q301C has a rating of 3.1.
|
✕
Micromax CG666
₹1,249
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Reliance ZTE Q301C
₹6,721
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|