Micromax Q7 vs Celkon C50 3D

Comparing the Micromax Q7 vs Celkon C50 3D across camera to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Rear Camera: Celkon C50 3D offers a higher rear camera resolution with 3.2 MP, while Micromax Q7 offers 2 MP, making Celkon C50 3D better for rear camera photography.

Micromax Q7

₹7,499

(Discontinued)

Celkon C50 3D

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

15 May, 2010

N/A

Display

N/A	4 inches (10.16 cm)
320x240 px	320x480 px

Rear Camera

2 MP

Primary Camera

3.2 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

800 mAh

N/A

Storage

78 MB

N/A

User Ratings

2.9/5

(28 ratings)

N/A

User Feedback

Display

Screen Size

N/A	4 inches (10.16 cm)

Resolution

320x240 px

320x480 px

Pixel Density

N/A

144 ppi

Design

Height

110 mm

N/A

Width

59 mm

N/A

Thickness

10.70 mm

N/A

Weight

100 grams

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

3.2 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Shooting Modes

N/A	Continuous Shooting

Camera Features

Digital Zoom
Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

800 mAh

N/A

Battery Type

Li-ion

N/A

TalkTime

Up to 4.5(2G)

N/A

Storage

Internal Storage

78 MB

N/A

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 4 GB

Yes Up to 32 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 a/b/g)

N/A

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Audio Jack

3.5 mm

N/A

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 AMR MIDI WAV Background Music Playback Built in Yamaha Audio Amplifier

Yes Music Formats: Yes Multi Format Music Player

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

N/A

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes 1000 entries Photocall

Yes

SMS

Yes 1000 Entries

Yes

MMS

Yes

Other Facilities

Voice memo T9

N/A