Micromax X325 vs Celkon C72

Comparing the Micromax X325 vs Celkon C72 across display, camera and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both Micromax X325 and Celkon C72 offer the same screen size of 2.8 inches and feature the same LCD display.

Rear Camera: Celkon C72 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while Micromax X325 offers 0.3 MP, making Celkon C72 better for rear camera photography.

Battery: Celkon C72 offers a higher battery capacity with 1500 mAh, while Micromax X325 offers 1300 mAh, making Celkon C72 better for longer battery life.

Micromax X325

₹2,450

(Discontinued)

Celkon C72

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

19 Jan, 2017

N/A

Display

2.8 inches (7.11 cm)	2.8 inches (7.11 cm)
LCD	LCD
320x240 px	240x320 px

Rear Camera

0.3 MP

Primary Camera

1.3 MP

Primary Camera

Battery

1300 mAh

1500 mAh

Storage

258 KB

N/A

User Ratings

3.8/5

(109 ratings)

N/A

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

2.8 inches (7.11 cm)

Resolution

320x240 px

240x320 px

Pixel Density

143 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

34.75 %

N/A

Design

Height

126.9 mm

N/A

Width

55.1 mm

N/A

Thickness

10.95 mm

N/A

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Battery

Capacity

1300 mAh

1500 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 4(2G)

N/A

Storage

Internal Storage

258 KB

N/A

Expandable Storage

Yes Up to 4 GB

Yes Up to 8 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes Music Formats : MP3 MIDI

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player Loud Speaker

Sensors

Java

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes 500 Entries

Yes

SMS

Yes SMS Storage 300

Yes

MMS

N/A

Yes

Applications

Mi Zone+ Mi Live Hook up EZ mail

N/A