Microsoft Lumia 532 Dual SIM
₹6,100
(Discontinued)
|
70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB
₹8,599
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Microsoft Lumia 532 Dual SIM vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB
Comparing the Microsoft Lumia 532 Dual SIM vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB runs at a higher processing speed of 1.8 GHz, while Microsoft Lumia 532 Dual SIM runs at 1.2 GHz, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB the better performer.
Display: Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB offers a screen size of 5.5 inches, while Microsoft Lumia 532 Dual SIM offers 4 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB the larger display of the two. Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB features a IPS LCD display compared to Microsoft Lumia 532 Dual SIM's LCD, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB offers a higher rear camera resolution with 16 MP, while Microsoft Lumia 532 Dual SIM offers 5 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB offers a higher front camera resolution with 5 MP, while Microsoft Lumia 532 Dual SIM offers 0.3 MP, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB better for front camera photography.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB offers a higher battery capacity with 4050 mAh, while Microsoft Lumia 532 Dual SIM offers 1560 mAh, making Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB better for longer battery life.
Storage: Microsoft Lumia 532 Dual SIM offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB offers 32 GB, making Microsoft Lumia 532 Dual SIM the better option for storage.
User Rating: Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Microsoft Lumia 532 Dual SIM has a rating of 3.9.
|
Microsoft Lumia 532 Dual SIM
₹6,100
(Discontinued)
|
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 32GB
₹8,599
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
70%
|
Release Date
|
07 Feb, 2015
|
09 Mar, 2016
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
Snapdragon 650
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
Hexa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
16 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
0.3 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1560 mAh
|
4050 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
32 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 4.5
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.9/5
(612 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(198,832 ratings)
|
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Mar 09, 2016
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Android v5.1 (Lollipop)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Hexa Core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A72 1.2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
28 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
Adreno 510
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
2 GB / 3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR3
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
16:9
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
401 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
58.42 %
|
72.98 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Design
Height
|
118.9 mm
|
150 mm
|
Width
|
65.5 mm
|
76 mm
|
Thickness
|
11.6 mm
|
8.6 mm
|
Weight
|
136 grams
|
164 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Aluminium
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.428 mm focal length |
16 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.0CMOS image sensor |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes Dual-color LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
4616 x 3464 Pixels
|
Settings
|
N/A
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Digital image stabilization Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
848x480x30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @120 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
f/2.0 Primary CameraPureCel |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
No
|
Video Recording
|
640x480 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1560 mAh
|
4050 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 12 Hours(3G) / Up to 20.9 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
16 GB / 32 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 4.5
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro
|
SIM1: Micro SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 1.256 W/kg Body: 1.102 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|