Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Moto E6s vs Ai+ Pulse
Comparing the Moto E6s vs Ai+ Pulse across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Moto E6s runs at a higher processing speed of 2.0 GHz, while Ai+ Pulse runs at 1.8 GHz, making Moto E6s the better performer.
Display: Ai+ Pulse offers a screen size of 6.7 inches, while Moto E6s offers 6.1 inches, making Ai+ Pulse the larger display of the two. Moto E6s features a IPS LCD display compared to Ai+ Pulse's TFT IPS, making Moto E6s the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Ai+ Pulse offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Moto E6s offers 13 MP, making Ai+ Pulse better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Moto E6s offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Ai+ Pulse offers 5 MP, making Moto E6s better for front camera photography.
Battery: Ai+ Pulse offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Moto E6s offers 3000 mAh, making Ai+ Pulse better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Moto E6s and Ai+ Pulse offer the same internal storage of 64 GB.
User Rating: Ai+ Pulse receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Moto E6s has a rating of 4.1.
Summary
Spec Score
|
66%
|
69%
|
Release Date
|
23 Sep, 2019
|
12 Jul, 2025
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
Unisoc T615
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.1 inches (15.49 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT IPS
|
|
720x1560 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
90 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expert Review
|
6.0/10
|
N/A
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.1/5
(79,387 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(42,942 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
79,221
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
9h 20m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Sep 23, 2019
(Official)
|
Jul 08, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v15
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
Unisoc T615
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A75 1.6 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
Mali-G57
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR3
|
N/A
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
79,221
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
21.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
10.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
24.6 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT IPS
|
Screen Size
|
6.1 inches (15.49 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1560 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
450 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
90 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
282 ppi
|
262 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
80.24 %
|
83.7 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
No
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
80 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
155.6 mm
|
167.35 mm
|
Width
|
73 mm
|
77.37 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.6 mm
|
8.5 mm
|
Weight
|
149.7 grams
|
193 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Capacity
|
3000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
9h 20m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
4h 34m 5s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|