Motorola E685 CDMA vs ZTE Coral200 Sollar

Comparing the Motorola E685 CDMA vs ZTE Coral200 Sollar across battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Battery: Motorola E685 CDMA offers a higher battery capacity with 950 mAh, while ZTE Coral200 Sollar offers 690 mAh, making Motorola E685 CDMA better for longer battery life.

Storage: Motorola E685 CDMA offers higher internal storage with 85 GB, while ZTE Coral200 Sollar offers 4 GB, making Motorola E685 CDMA the better option for storage.

Motorola E685 CDMA

(Discontinued)

ZTE Coral200 Sollar

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

N/A	01 May, 2007

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

N/A

Screen Size

1.3 inches (3.3 cm)

N/A

Resolution

128x160 px

128x128 px

Pixel Density

158 ppi

N/A

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

18.24 %

N/A

Design

Height

90 mm

106 mm

Width

32.4 mm

45.6 mm

Thickness

21.20 mm

18.10 mm

Weight

70 grams

85 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

0.3 MP
Primary Camera

N/A

Flash

Yes

N/A

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

N/A

Battery

Capacity

950 mAh

690 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 3(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

85 MB

4 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Yes Music Formats: No

Sensors

Games

N/A

2 Games

Java

Yes

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes	Yes 300 entries

SMS

N/A	SMS Storage 100

Other Facilities

Key Features and Enablers Antenna Type : Internal Input Method : Keypad Calendar Scheduler Alarm Clock Real Time Clock Internal Vibrating Alert

Calculator T9