Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Nokia 2.2 vs Lava Z62
Comparing the Nokia 2.2 vs Lava Z62 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Nokia 2.2 and Lava Z62 run at the same processing speed of 2.0 GHz.
Display: Lava Z62 offers a screen size of 6 inches, while Nokia 2.2 offers 5.71 inches, making Lava Z62 the larger display of the two. Both Nokia 2.2 and Lava Z62 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Nokia 2.2 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while Lava Z62 offers 8 MP, making Nokia 2.2 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Nokia 2.2 and Lava Z62 feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Lava Z62 offers a higher battery capacity with 3380 mAh, while Nokia 2.2 offers 3000 mAh, making Lava Z62 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Nokia 2.2 and Lava Z62 offer the same internal storage of 16 GB.
User Rating: Lava Z62 receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while Nokia 2.2 has a rating of 3.8.
Summary
Spec Score
|
69%
|
68%
|
Release Date
|
10 Jun, 2019
|
28 Jun, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
|
Quad Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
2 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5.71 inches (14.5 cm)
|
6.0 inches (15.24 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
480x960 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3000 mAh
|
3380 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
16 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(4,883 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(512 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
65,184
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
12h 19m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jun 10, 2019
(Official)
|
Jun 28, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Android One
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Avg
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Quad core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
N/A
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8300
|
PowerVR GE8300
|
RAM
|
2 GB / 3 GB
|
2 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR3
|
LPDDR3
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
65,184
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
30.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
24.5 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.71 inches (14.5 cm)
|
6.0 inches (15.24 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
480x960 px
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19:9
|
18:9
|
Pixel Density
|
295 ppi
|
179 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
78.73 %
|
76.75 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
No
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes
|
Design
Height
|
145.9 mm
|
157.4 mm
|
Width
|
70.5 mm
|
76.9 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.3 mm
|
8.9 mm
|
Weight
|
153 grams
|
182.8 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Polycarbonate
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.21/3" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.01.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
5 MP
f/2.2 Primary Camera1.4µm pixel size |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3000 mAh
|
3380 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 22.4 Hours(4G)
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 19m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
2h 55m 45s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB / 32 GB
|
16 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 400 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|