|
69%
Nokia 2.3
₹8,120
(Out of Stock)
|
LG W10 Alpha
₹7,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Nokia 2.3 vs LG W10 Alpha
Comparing the Nokia 2.3 vs LG W10 Alpha across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Nokia 2.3 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.0 GHz, while LG W10 Alpha runs at 1.6 GHz, making Nokia 2.3 the better performer.
Display: Nokia 2.3 offers a screen size of 6.2 inches, while LG W10 Alpha offers 5.71 inches, making Nokia 2.3 the larger display of the two. Both Nokia 2.3 and LG W10 Alpha feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Nokia 2.3 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while LG W10 Alpha offers 8 MP, making Nokia 2.3 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: LG W10 Alpha offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Nokia 2.3 offers 5 MP, making LG W10 Alpha better for front camera photography.
Battery: Nokia 2.3 offers a higher battery capacity with 4000 mAh, while LG W10 Alpha offers 3450 mAh, making Nokia 2.3 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Nokia 2.3 and LG W10 Alpha offer the same internal storage of 32 GB.
User Rating: Nokia 2.3 receives a higher user rating of 3.8, while LG W10 Alpha has a rating of 3.6.
|
✕
Nokia 2.3
₹8,120
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
LG W10 Alpha
₹7,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
69%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
27 Dec, 2019
|
19 Feb, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
Unisoc SC9863
|
|
Quad Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 1.6 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
6.2 inches (15.75 cm)
|
5.71 inches (14.5 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
4000 mAh
|
3450 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
32 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(3,001 ratings)
|
3.6/5
(534 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
17h 26m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Dec 27, 2019
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
Android One
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
Unisoc SC9863
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core, 1.6 GHz, Cortex A55
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
N/A
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8300
|
PowerVR GE8322
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR3
|
N/A
|
Performance Test Results
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
29.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
6.5 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.2 inches (15.75 cm)
|
5.71 inches (14.5 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19:9
|
19:9
|
Pixel Density
|
271 ppi
|
295 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
80.34 %
|
77.43 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
86.83 %
|
Design
Height
|
157.6 mm
|
147.3 mm
|
Width
|
75.4 mm
|
71 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.6 mm
|
8.9 mm
|
Weight
|
183 grams
|
170 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.21/3.1" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
Primary CameraCMOS image sensor |
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary CameraCMOS |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
3450 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 12 Hours(4G) / Up to 16 Hours(2G)
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
17h 26m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
5h 7m 46s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB
|
32 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
N/A
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.82 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v4.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|