Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM
₹5,499
(Discontinued)
|
54%
Celkon Win 400
₹1,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM vs Celkon Win 400
Comparing the Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM vs Celkon Win 400 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Celkon Win 400 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM runs at 1.2 GHz, making Celkon Win 400 the better performer.
Display: Both Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM and Celkon Win 400 offer the same screen size of 4 inches, but Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM features a LCD display compared to Celkon Win 400's TFT, making Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM and Celkon Win 400 feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Battery: Celkon Win 400 offers a higher battery capacity with 1500 mAh, while Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM offers 1430 mAh, making Celkon Win 400 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM and Celkon Win 400 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM and Celkon Win 400 both receive the same user rating of 4.
|
✕
Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM
₹5,499
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Celkon Win 400
₹1,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
54%
|
Release Date
|
12 Aug, 2014
|
27 Nov, 2014
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
Snapdragon 200
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
|
480x854 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
1.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1430 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(3,185 ratings)
|
4/5
(28 ratings)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
245 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
59.01 %
|
55.82 %
|
Design
Height
|
119.7 mm
|
125.4 mm
|
Width
|
62.3 mm
|
65 mm
|
Thickness
|
11.7 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Weight
|
129 grams
|
121 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.428 mm focal length |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
No
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
848x480x30 fps
|
1280x720 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Resolution
|
N/A
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1430 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 10 Hours(3G) / Up to 13.4 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro SIM2: Micro
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|