Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM
₹5,499
(Discontinued)
|
52%
iBall Andi 4L Pulse
₹3,499
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM vs iBall Andi 4L Pulse
Comparing the Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM vs iBall Andi 4L Pulse across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM and iBall Andi 4L Pulse run at the same processing speed of 1.2 GHz.
Display: Both Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM and iBall Andi 4L Pulse offer the same screen size of 4 inches and feature the same LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM and iBall Andi 4L Pulse feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Battery: iBall Andi 4L Pulse offers a higher battery capacity with 1500 mAh, while Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM offers 1430 mAh, making iBall Andi 4L Pulse better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM and iBall Andi 4L Pulse offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM receives a higher user rating of 4, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse has a rating of 3.8.
|
✕
Nokia Lumia 530 Dual SIM
₹5,499
(Discontinued)
|
✕
iBall Andi 4L Pulse
₹3,499
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
52%
|
Release Date
|
12 Aug, 2014
|
05 Jan, 2015
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
Snapdragon 200
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
|
480x854 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1430 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(3,185 ratings)
|
3.8/5
(114 ratings)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
245 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
59.01 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
119.7 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
62.3 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
11.7 mm
|
N/A
|
Weight
|
129 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.428 mm focal length |
5 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
Flash
|
No
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
848x480x30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
N/A
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1430 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 10 Hours(3G) / Up to 13.4 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro SIM2: Micro
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v3.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|