|
51%
Oorie MS927B
|
Coolpad ivvi K1
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Oorie MS927B vs Coolpad ivvi K1
Comparing the Oorie MS927B vs Coolpad ivvi K1 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Oorie MS927B runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Coolpad ivvi K1 runs at 1.2 GHz, making Oorie MS927B the better performer.
Display: Coolpad ivvi K1 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Oorie MS927B offers 4.5 inches, making Coolpad ivvi K1 the larger display of the two. Coolpad ivvi K1 features a IPS LCD display compared to Oorie MS927B's LCD, making Coolpad ivvi K1 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Coolpad ivvi K1 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Oorie MS927B offers 2 MP, making Coolpad ivvi K1 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Coolpad ivvi K1 offers a higher front camera resolution with 5 MP, while Oorie MS927B offers 0.3 MP, making Coolpad ivvi K1 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Coolpad ivvi K1 offers a higher battery capacity with 2000 mAh, while Oorie MS927B offers 1650 mAh, making Coolpad ivvi K1 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Coolpad ivvi K1 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Oorie MS927B offers 4 GB, making Coolpad ivvi K1 the better option for storage.
|
✕
Oorie MS927B
|
✕
Coolpad ivvi K1
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
51%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
31 Oct, 2014
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Snapdragon 410
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x854 px
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1650 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Cool UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400
|
Adreno 306
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
218 ppi
|
294 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
62.14 %
|
68.31 %
|
Design
Height
|
134 mm
|
142 mm
|
Width
|
67 mm
|
71 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.05 mm
|
5.9 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
110 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.0 |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Settings
|
N/A
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Digital image stabilization Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary CameraBSI Sensor |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1650 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 3 Hours(3G) / Up to 5 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
SIM 1
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 1900(band 39)
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|