|
76%
OPPO F11
₹11,999
(Discontinued)
|
74%
realme 5 Pro
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
OPPO F11 vs realme 5 Pro
Comparing the OPPO F11 vs realme 5 Pro across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme 5 Pro runs at a higher processing speed of 2.3 GHz, while OPPO F11 runs at 2.1 GHz, making realme 5 Pro the better performer.
Display: OPPO F11 offers a screen size of 6.5 inches, while realme 5 Pro offers 6.3 inches, making OPPO F11 the larger display of the two. OPPO F11 features a TFT LTPS display compared to realme 5 Pro's IPS LCD, making OPPO F11 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both OPPO F11 and realme 5 Pro feature a 48 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both OPPO F11 and realme 5 Pro feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: realme 5 Pro offers a higher battery capacity with 4035 mAh, while OPPO F11 offers 4020 mAh, making realme 5 Pro better for longer battery life.
Storage: realme 5 Pro offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while OPPO F11 offers 128 GB, making realme 5 Pro the better option for storage.
Expert Review: realme 5 Pro receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while OPPO F11 is rated 7.
User Rating: realme 5 Pro receives a higher user rating of 4.5, while OPPO F11 has a rating of 4.4.
|
✕
OPPO F11
₹11,999
(Discontinued)
|
✕
realme 5 Pro
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
76%
|
74%
|
Release Date
|
15 May, 2019
|
04 Sep, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
Snapdragon 712
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.1 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
|
TFT LTPS
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4020 mAh
|
4035 mAh
|
|
20W VOOC Charging
|
20W VOOC Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expert Review
|
7.0/10
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4.4/5
(88,613 ratings)
|
4.5/5
(148,187 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
180,355
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
14h 39m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Sep 04, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Custom UI
|
ColorOS
|
ColorOS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P70
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.1 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A73 2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 360 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 360 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
12 nm
|
10 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G72 MP3
|
Adreno 616
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
180,355
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
22.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
7.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
25.5 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
TFT LTPS
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
6.3 inches (16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2340 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
450 nits
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19.5:9
|
19.5:9
|
Pixel Density
|
396 ppi
|
409 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
83.94 %
|
83.45 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Corning Gorilla
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
90.7 %
|
90.6 %
|
Design
Height
|
162 mm
|
157 mm
|
Width
|
76.1 mm
|
74.2 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.3 mm
|
8.9 mm
|
Weight
|
188 grams
|
184 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Camera2x Digital Zoomf/1.794.73 mm focal length 1/2.25" sensor size CMOS image sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
48 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.794.73 mm focal length 1/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera2.176 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
8 MP
f/2.25 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.66 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera1.77 mm focal length 1/5.0" sensor size 1.75µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
2 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
4k @30 fps
Full HD @60 fps HD @240 fps |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera3.58 mm focal length 1/3.1" sensor size CMOS 1µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera3.82 mm focal length 1/3" sensor size Exmor RS 1µm pixel size |
Camera Features
|
N/A
|
Fixed Focus
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4020 mAh
|
4035 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 36 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 20W VOOC Charging v3.0
|
Yes 20W VOOC Charging v3.0 55% in 30 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
14h 39m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 11m 25s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
eMMC 5.1
|
UFS 2.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 1.190 W/kg Body: 0.600 W/kg
|
Head: 1.28 W/kg Body: 0.831 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.2
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|