|
50%
Panasonic Love T10
₹1,999
(Discontinued)
|
Videocon Infinium Z45Q Star
₹4,444
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Panasonic Love T10 vs Videocon Infinium Z45Q Star
Comparing the Panasonic Love T10 vs Videocon Infinium Z45Q Star across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Videocon Infinium Z45Q Star runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Panasonic Love T10 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Videocon Infinium Z45Q Star the better performer.
Display: Videocon Infinium Z45Q Star offers a screen size of 4.5 inches, while Panasonic Love T10 offers 3.5 inches, making Videocon Infinium Z45Q Star the larger display of the two. Both Panasonic Love T10 and Videocon Infinium Z45Q Star feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Videocon Infinium Z45Q Star offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Panasonic Love T10 offers 2 MP, making Videocon Infinium Z45Q Star better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Videocon Infinium Z45Q Star offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Panasonic Love T10 offers 0.3 MP, making Videocon Infinium Z45Q Star better for front camera photography.
Battery: Videocon Infinium Z45Q Star offers a higher battery capacity with 1600 mAh, while Panasonic Love T10 offers 1400 mAh, making Videocon Infinium Z45Q Star better for longer battery life.
Storage: Videocon Infinium Z45Q Star offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Panasonic Love T10 offers 4 GB, making Videocon Infinium Z45Q Star the better option for storage.
User Rating: Panasonic Love T10 receives a higher user rating of 3.5, while Videocon Infinium Z45Q Star has a rating of 2.9.
|
✕
Panasonic Love T10
₹1,999
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Videocon Infinium Z45Q Star
₹4,444
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
50%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
03 Aug, 2015
|
18 Aug, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1400 mAh
|
1600 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.5/5
(402 ratings)
|
2.9/5
(77 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
267 ppi
|
218 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
50.12 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
112.2 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
62 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
11.9 mm
|
N/A
|
Weight
|
100 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1400 mAh
|
1600 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|