|
51%
Philips S308
₹3,519
(Discontinued)
|
Videocon Challenger V40DF
₹2,660
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Philips S308 vs Videocon Challenger V40DF
Comparing the Philips S308 vs Videocon Challenger V40DF across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Videocon Challenger V40DF runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Philips S308 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Videocon Challenger V40DF the better performer.
Display: Both Philips S308 and Videocon Challenger V40DF offer the same screen size of 4 inches and feature the same TFT display.
Rear Camera: Both Philips S308 and Videocon Challenger V40DF feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both Philips S308 and Videocon Challenger V40DF feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Philips S308 offers a higher battery capacity with 1400 mAh, while Videocon Challenger V40DF offers 1350 mAh, making Philips S308 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Videocon Challenger V40DF offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Philips S308 offers 4 GB, making Videocon Challenger V40DF the better option for storage.
User Rating: Videocon Challenger V40DF receives a higher user rating of 3.4, while Philips S308 has a rating of 3.3.
|
✕
Philips S308
₹3,519
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Videocon Challenger V40DF
₹2,660
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
51%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
15 Jun, 2014
|
18 Apr, 2016
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
Spreadtrum SC7731
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1400 mAh
|
1350 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.3/5
(65 ratings)
|
3.4/5
(83 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
Spreadtrum SC7731
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
55.98 %
|
56.94 %
|
Design
Height
|
126 mm
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
64.5 mm
|
64.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.7 mm
|
9.0 mm
|
Weight
|
125 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary CameraCMOS image sensor |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection |
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
N/A
|
No
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1400 mAh
|
1350 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 9.5 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 11 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 64 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
N/A
|
SIM1: Micro SIM2: Mini
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v2.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
N/A
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|