|
56%
Prestigio Multiphone 3502 Duo
|
67%
Infinix Hot 8
₹8,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Prestigio Multiphone 3502 Duo vs Infinix Hot 8
Comparing the Prestigio Multiphone 3502 Duo vs Infinix Hot 8 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Infinix Hot 8 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.0 GHz, while Prestigio Multiphone 3502 Duo runs at 1.3 GHz, making Infinix Hot 8 the better performer.
Display: Infinix Hot 8 offers a screen size of 6.52 inches, while Prestigio Multiphone 3502 Duo offers 5 inches, making Infinix Hot 8 the larger display of the two. Both Prestigio Multiphone 3502 Duo and Infinix Hot 8 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Infinix Hot 8 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while Prestigio Multiphone 3502 Duo offers 8 MP, making Infinix Hot 8 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Infinix Hot 8 offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Prestigio Multiphone 3502 Duo offers 0.3 MP, making Infinix Hot 8 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Infinix Hot 8 offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Prestigio Multiphone 3502 Duo offers 1850 mAh, making Infinix Hot 8 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Infinix Hot 8 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Prestigio Multiphone 3502 Duo offers 4 GB, making Infinix Hot 8 the better option for storage.
|
✕
Prestigio Multiphone 3502 Duo
|
✕
Infinix Hot 8
₹8,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
56%
|
67%
|
Release Date
|
N/A
|
12 Sep, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6582M
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x854 px
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
0.3 MP
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
1850 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
64 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
4.5/5
(259,897 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
92,074
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
16h 42m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Sep 12, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
Avg
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6582M
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Octa core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
4 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
92,074
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
23.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
8.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
20.0 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
196 ppi
|
269 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
64.62 %
|
81.52 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
90.3 %
|
Design
Height
|
146 mm
|
165 mm
|
Width
|
73 mm
|
76.3 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.1 mm
|
8.7 mm
|
Weight
|
173 grams
|
179 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81/3.1" sensor size S5K3L6 ISO-CELL 1.12µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Quad LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
Settings
|
N/A
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera25 mm focal length |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1850 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 18.1 Hours(4G)
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
16h 42m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
3h 14m 31s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
64 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
N/A
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.735 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
N/A
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|