RoverPC E5 vs Micromax Q3 ezpad

Comparing the RoverPC E5 vs Micromax Q3 ezpad across display, camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both RoverPC E5 and Micromax Q3 ezpad offer the same screen size of 2.2 inches and feature the same LCD display.

Rear Camera: RoverPC E5 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 2 MP, while Micromax Q3 ezpad offers 1.3 MP, making RoverPC E5 better for rear camera photography.

Storage: RoverPC E5 offers higher internal storage with 128 GB, while Micromax Q3 ezpad offers 10 GB, making RoverPC E5 the better option for storage.

RoverPC E5

(Discontinued)

Micromax Q3 ezpad

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Sep, 2007

15 Jun, 2009

User Feedback

General

Operating System

Windows Mobile

N/A

Performance

RAM

64 MB

N/A

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

2.20 inches (5.59 cm)

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

Resolution

320.00x 320 pixels 2.2 inches px

176x220 px

Pixel Density

206 ppi

128 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

23.08 %

22.38 %

Design

Height

111.80 mm

111.2 mm

Width

60.50 mm

61.2 mm

Thickness

15.80 mm

13.00 mm

Weight

108 grams

97 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

2 MP
Primary Camera

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Battery

Capacity

N/A

1000 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 4(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

128 MB

10 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 2 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

N/A	Yes Music Formats: Yes Multi Format Music Player (MP3 / AMR / MIDI / WAV) Background Music Playback Flight Mode

Sensors

Java

N/A	Yes MIDP 2.0

Browser

N/A

Yes

Phone Book

N/A	1000 entries Photocall

SMS

N/A	Yes SMS Storage 1000

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

N/A	Voice memo T9