RoverPC M5 vs Micromax Q3 ezpad

Comparing the RoverPC M5 vs Micromax Q3 ezpad across display, camera and storage to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Both RoverPC M5 and Micromax Q3 ezpad offer the same screen size of 2.2 inches and feature the same LCD display.

Rear Camera: Both RoverPC M5 and Micromax Q3 ezpad feature a 1.3 MP primary rear camera.

Storage: RoverPC M5 offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Micromax Q3 ezpad offers 10 GB, making RoverPC M5 the better option for storage.

RoverPC M5

(Discontinued)

Micromax Q3 ezpad

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

01 Jan, 2006

15 Jun, 2009

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

LCD

Screen Size

2.20 inches (5.59 cm)

2.2 inches (5.59 cm)

Resolution

220.00x 220 pixels 2.2 inches px

176x220 px

Pixel Density

141 ppi

128 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

30.69 %

22.38 %

Design

Height

106.00 mm

111.2 mm

Width

48.00 mm

61.2 mm

Thickness

16.00 mm

13.00 mm

Weight

99 grams

97 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

1.3 MP
Primary Camera

Flash

Yes

Camera Features

Digital Zoom

Battery

Capacity

N/A

1000 mAh

Battery Type

N/A

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 5(2G)

Up to 4(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

64 MB

10 MB

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 2 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

Bluetooth

Yes

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: Yes MP3 Player

Yes Music Formats: Yes Multi Format Music Player (MP3 / AMR / MIDI / WAV) Background Music Playback Flight Mode

Sensors

Java

Yes MIDP 2.0

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

Yes	1000 entries Photocall

SMS

N/A	Yes SMS Storage 1000

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

Organizer Voice memo Handsfree Predictive text input T9

Voice memo T9