Samsung E1080f vs Micromax X290

Comparing the Samsung E1080f vs Micromax X290 across display and battery to help determine the better smartphone.

Here is the summary of the results:

Display: Micromax X290 offers a screen size of 2.4 inches, while Samsung E1080f offers 1.4 inches, making Micromax X290 the larger display of the two.

Battery: Micromax X290 offers a higher battery capacity with 850 mAh, while Samsung E1080f offers 800 mAh, making Micromax X290 better for longer battery life.

Samsung E1080f

(Discontinued)

Micromax X290

₹1,409

(Discontinued)

Add to Compare

Show Only Differences

Summary

Release Date

N/A	11 Nov, 2010

Display

1.40 inches (3.56 cm)	2.4 inches (6.1 cm)
N/A	LCD
128x128 px	240x320 px

Rear Camera

N/A	1.3 MP Primary Camera

Battery

800 mAh

850 mAh

Storage

1 MB

N/A

User Ratings

N/A	3.4/5 (8 ratings)

User Feedback

Display

Display Type

N/A

LCD

Screen Size

1.40 inches (3.56 cm)

2.4 inches (6.1 cm)

Resolution

128x128 px

240x320 px

Pixel Density

129 ppi

167 ppi

Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)

N/A

31.71 %

Design

Height

107.4 mm

113.5 mm

Width

45.5 mm

49.6 mm

Thickness

13.60 mm

14.35 mm

Weight

64.5 grams

86 grams

Rear Camera

Resolution

N/A	1.3 MP Primary Camera

Flash

N/A

Yes

Camera Features

N/A	Digital Zoom Smile detection

Battery

Capacity

800 mAh

850 mAh

Battery Type

Li-ion

TalkTime

Up to 12(2G)

Up to 4(2G)

Storage

Internal Storage

1 MB

N/A

Expandable Storage

Yes	Yes Up to 2 GB

Network & Connectivity

SIM Slot(s)

Single SIM

Dual SIM

Network Support

5G Not Supported

Wi-Fi

N/A

Bluetooth

N/A

Multimedia

Music

Yes Music Formats: No

Yes Music Formats: Yes Multi Format Music Player with 3.5mm Audio Jack

Sensors

Java

N/A

Browser

Yes

Phone Book

1000 Contacts

Yes

SMS

N/A

Yes

MMS

N/A

Yes

Other Facilities

Clock Calendar Alarm Calculator Stopwatch Countdown Timer Mobile Tracker.

N/A