Samsung Galaxy Core Max
₹22,990
(Discontinued)
|
53%
Polaroid PROGD16
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy Core Max vs Polaroid PROGD16
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Core Max vs Polaroid PROGD16 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy Core Max runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Polaroid PROGD16 runs at 1.0 GHz, making Samsung Galaxy Core Max the better performer.
Display: Polaroid PROGD16 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Samsung Galaxy Core Max offers 4.8 inches, making Polaroid PROGD16 the larger display of the two. Samsung Galaxy Core Max features a Super AMOLED display compared to Polaroid PROGD16's LCD, making Samsung Galaxy Core Max the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy Core Max offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Polaroid PROGD16 offers 5 MP, making Samsung Galaxy Core Max better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Samsung Galaxy Core Max offers a higher front camera resolution with 5 MP, while Polaroid PROGD16 offers 0.3 MP, making Samsung Galaxy Core Max better for front camera photography.
Battery: Polaroid PROGD16 offers a higher battery capacity with 2500 mAh, while Samsung Galaxy Core Max offers 2200 mAh, making Polaroid PROGD16 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Samsung Galaxy Core Max offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Polaroid PROGD16 offers 4 GB, making Samsung Galaxy Core Max the better option for storage.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy Core Max
₹22,990
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Polaroid PROGD16
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
53%
|
Release Date
|
30 Dec, 2014
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
MediaTek MT6577
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
N/A
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.8 inches (12.19 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
LCD
|
|
540x960 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
5 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
2200 mAh
|
2500 mAh
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
2/5
(1 rating)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.1 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
N/A
|
MediaTek MT6577
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, ARM Cortex A9
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
PowerVR SGX 531
|
RAM
|
N/A
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.8 inches (12.19 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
540x960 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
229 ppi
|
196 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
66.62 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
136.9 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
69.6 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
8 mm
|
N/A
|
Weight
|
132 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
2200 mAh
|
2500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Single SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) |
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with Glonass
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
N/A
|
Accelerometer
|