Samsung Galaxy Star
₹3,599
(Discontinued)
|
52%
Karbonn Titanium Wind W4
₹3,300
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy Star vs Karbonn Titanium Wind W4
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Star vs Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Samsung Galaxy Star runs at 1.0 GHz, making Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 the better performer.
Display: Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 offers a screen size of 4 inches, while Samsung Galaxy Star offers 3 inches, making Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 the larger display of the two. Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 features a LCD display compared to Samsung Galaxy Star's TFT, making Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Samsung Galaxy Star offers 2 MP, making Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 better for rear camera photography.
Battery: Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 offers a higher battery capacity with 1950 mAh, while Samsung Galaxy Star offers 1200 mAh, making Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Samsung Galaxy Star and Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Karbonn Titanium Wind W4 receives a higher user rating of 3.9, while Samsung Galaxy Star has a rating of 3.8.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy Star
₹3,599
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Karbonn Titanium Wind W4
₹3,300
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
52%
|
Release Date
|
N/A
|
25 Sep, 2014
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
Spreadtrum SC8810
|
Snapdragon 200
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
3 inches (7.62 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
|
240x320 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1200 mAh
|
1950 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(2,012 ratings)
|
3.9/5
(101 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.1.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Windows v8.1
|
Custom UI
|
TouchWiz UI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
Spreadtrum SC8810
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
|
Processor
|
Single core, 1 GHz, Cortex A5
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-300 MP
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
3 inches (7.62 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
240x320 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
133 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
45.29 %
|
56.61 %
|
Design
Height
|
105.2 mm
|
125 mm
|
Width
|
58.5 mm
|
64.3 mm
|
Thickness
|
11.9 mm
|
10.9 mm
|
Weight
|
102.5 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
320x240 @ 15 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
N/A
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1200 mAh
|
1950 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 14 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 8 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.77 W/kg Body: 0.62 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|