Samsung Galaxy Star
₹3,599
(Discontinued)
|
52%
Micromax Bolt A47
₹4,499
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Samsung Galaxy Star vs Micromax Bolt A47
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Star vs Micromax Bolt A47 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Micromax Bolt A47 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Samsung Galaxy Star runs at 1.0 GHz, making Micromax Bolt A47 the better performer.
Display: Micromax Bolt A47 offers a screen size of 4 inches, while Samsung Galaxy Star offers 3 inches, making Micromax Bolt A47 the larger display of the two. Micromax Bolt A47 features a IPS LCD display compared to Samsung Galaxy Star's TFT, making Micromax Bolt A47 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Samsung Galaxy Star and Micromax Bolt A47 feature a 2 MP primary rear camera.
Battery: Micromax Bolt A47 offers a higher battery capacity with 1600 mAh, while Samsung Galaxy Star offers 1200 mAh, making Micromax Bolt A47 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Micromax Bolt A47 offers higher internal storage with 512 GB, while Samsung Galaxy Star offers 4 GB, making Micromax Bolt A47 the better option for storage.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy Star receives a higher user rating of 3.8, while Micromax Bolt A47 has a rating of 3.6.
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy Star
₹3,599
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Micromax Bolt A47
₹4,499
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
52%
|
Release Date
|
N/A
|
30 Jan, 2017
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
Spreadtrum SC8810
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
256 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
3 inches (7.62 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
|
240x320 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1200 mAh
|
1600 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
512 MB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(2,012 ratings)
|
3.6/5
(748 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.1.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Custom UI
|
TouchWiz UI
|
N/A
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
Spreadtrum SC8810
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Processor
|
Single core, 1 GHz, Cortex A5
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-300 MP
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
256 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
3 inches (7.62 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
240x320 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
133 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
45.29 %
|
56 %
|
Design
Height
|
105.2 mm
|
125 mm
|
Width
|
58.5 mm
|
65 mm
|
Thickness
|
11.9 mm
|
12.3 mm
|
Weight
|
102.5 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
320x240 @ 15 fps
|
640x480 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
N/A
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1200 mAh
|
1600 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 14 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 6 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
512 MB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.77 W/kg Body: 0.62 W/kg
|
Head: 0.64 W/kg Body: 0.20 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|
Applications
|
N/A
|
Hike Spuul MiLive Seven stars bubble X slice
|