|
70%
Smartron srt.phone 64GB
₹8,099
(Discontinued)
|
76%
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹13,999
@Samsung Shop
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Smartron srt.phone 64GB vs Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
Comparing the Smartron srt.phone 64GB vs Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G runs at a higher processing speed of 2.4 GHz, while Smartron srt.phone 64GB runs at 1.8 GHz, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G the better performer.
Display: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a screen size of 6.7 inches, while Smartron srt.phone 64GB offers 5.5 inches, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G the larger display of the two. Smartron srt.phone 64GB features a IPS LCD display compared to Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G's LCD, making Smartron srt.phone 64GB the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Smartron srt.phone 64GB offers 13 MP, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Smartron srt.phone 64GB offers 5 MP, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G better for front camera photography.
Battery: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while Smartron srt.phone 64GB offers 3000 mAh, making Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Smartron srt.phone 64GB offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G offers 128 GB, making Smartron srt.phone 64GB the better option for storage.
User Rating: Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G receives a higher user rating of 4.1, while Smartron srt.phone 64GB has a rating of 3.7.
|
✕
Smartron srt.phone 64GB
₹8,099
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Samsung Galaxy F70e 5G
₹13,999
@ Samsung Shop
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
70%
|
76%
|
Release Date
|
03 May, 2017
|
17 Feb, 2026
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 652
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300
|
|
Octa Core (upto 1.8 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
4 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
|
N/A
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
|
8 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
Quick Charging
|
25W Fast Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.2/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
3.7/5
(4,174 ratings)
|
4.1/5
(10,451 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
532,024
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
12h 51m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹13,999
@ Samsung Shop
|
|
₹15,788
@ Amazon
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Feb 09, 2026
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v7.1.1 (Nougat)
|
Android v16
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
6 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
6 Years
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
Samsung One UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 MT6835
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A72 1.44 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 510
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR3
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
532,024
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
30.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Wild Life Extreme (The higher, the better) Wild Life Extreme is a classic mobile benchmark; it renders in 4K to test the peak performance of a wide range of devices.
|
N/A
|
373
|
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
9.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
32.6 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
6.7 inches (17.02 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
800 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
120 Hz
|
Pixel Density
|
401 ppi
|
260 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
70.62 %
|
83.65 %
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
No
|
Bezel-less Display
|
N/A
|
Yes with notch
|
Design
Height
|
153 mm
|
167.4 mm
|
Width
|
77 mm
|
77.4 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.9 mm
|
8.2 mm
|
Weight
|
155 grams
|
191 grams
|
Build Material
|
N/A
|
Back: Leather Plastic
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Splash proof IP54
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.0Back-illuminated sensor BSI |
50 MP
Primary Camera10x Digital Zoomf/1.8 Wide Angle1/2.76" sensor size 0.64µm pixel size |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection autofocus
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
No
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
8160 x 6120 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
N/A
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
10 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash |
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
HD @120 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
f/2.0 Wide Angle Primary Camera26 mm focal length 1/4.0" sensor size 1.12µm pixel size |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
No
|
No
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3000 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes Quick Charging v2.0
|
Yes 25W Fast Charging
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
12h 51m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 14m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB / 64 GB
|
128 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
Yes Up to 1.5 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro SIM2: Micro
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
N/A
|
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) / 800(band 20) |
N/A
|
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.24 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.1
|
Yes v5.3
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|
Compare Prices
|
Not Available in any store
|
₹13,999
@ Samsung Shop
|
|
₹15,788
@ Amazon
|