|
78%
Tecno Pova 5 Pro
₹19,990
(Discontinued)
|
79%
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
₹14,965
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Tecno Pova 5 Pro vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
Comparing the Tecno Pova 5 Pro vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage, expert reviews and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G scores higher on the Geekbench Multi-Core test with 2,111, while Tecno Pova 5 Pro scores 2,077, making OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G the better performer.
Display: Tecno Pova 5 Pro offers a screen size of 6.78 inches, while OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G offers 6.72 inches, making Tecno Pova 5 Pro the larger display of the two. Both Tecno Pova 5 Pro and OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 108 MP, while Tecno Pova 5 Pro offers 50 MP, making OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both Tecno Pova 5 Pro and OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G feature a 16 MP primary front camera.
Battery: OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G delivers longer battery life with 14h 23m, while Tecno Pova 5 Pro delivers 11h 26m, making OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G the better pick for all day usage.
Storage: Both Tecno Pova 5 Pro and OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G offer the same internal storage of 128 GB.
Expert Review: Tecno Pova 5 Pro receives a higher expert rating of 8 from the editorial team, while OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G is rated 7.5.
User Rating: OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G receives a higher user rating of 4.3, while Tecno Pova 5 Pro has a rating of 4.
|
✕
Tecno Pova 5 Pro
₹19,990
(Discontinued)
|
✕
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite 5G
₹14,965
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
78%
|
79%
|
Release Date
|
22 Aug, 2023
|
11 Apr, 2023
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6080
|
Snapdragon 695
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2.4 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.2 GHz)
|
|
8 GB RAM
|
8 GB RAM
|
| Dimensity 6080 vs Snapdragon 695 | |
Display
|
|
|
|
6.78 inches (17.22 cm)
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
1080x2460 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
108 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
0.08 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
N/A
|
2 MP
Macro Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
68W Flash Charging
|
67W Super VOOC Charging
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
128 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expert Review
|
8.0/10
|
7.5/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
4/5
(7,651 ratings)
|
4.3/5
(237,030 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
413,805
AnTuTu Score
|
406,506
AnTuTu Score
|
|
11h 26m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
14h 23m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Apr 11, 2023
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v13
|
Android v13
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
3 Years
|
Custom UI
|
HiOS
|
Oxygen OS
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 MT6833
View Details
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2.4 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76 2 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55 |
Octa core
2.2 GHz, Dual core, Kryo 660 1.7 GHz, Hexa Core, Kryo 660 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
6 nm
|
6 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-G57 MC2
|
Adreno 619
|
RAM
|
8 GB
|
8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
413,805
|
406,506
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
21.0 s
|
30.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
4.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
35.6 %
|
17.0 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.78 inches (17.22 cm)
|
6.72 inches (17.07 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1080x2460 px (FHD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Brightness
|
580 nits
|
N/A
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
680 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
120 Hz
|
120 Hz
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
N/A
|
240 Hz
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
396 ppi
|
392 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
84.81 %
|
86.68 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
91.40 %
|
Design
Height
|
168.5 mm
|
165.5 mm
|
Width
|
76.5 mm
|
76 mm
|
Thickness
|
9 mm
|
8.3 mm
|
Weight
|
220 grams
|
195 grams
|
Build Material
|
Back: Plastic
|
Back: Plastic
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.6 Wide Angle1/2.7" sensor size |
108 MP
Primary Camera6x Digital Zoomf/1.7 Wide Angle1/1.67" sensor size S5KHM6 ISO-CELL 0.64µm pixel size |
|
0.08 MP
Depth Camera |
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera |
|
N/A
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Macro Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection Autofocus Continuous Autofocus
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
12000 x 9000 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) Macro Mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
6 x Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Filters Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
2k @30 fps
Full HD @30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
Dual Video Recording
|
Dual Video Recording
Bokeh portrait video |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
16 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary CameraExmor RS 1µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Full HD @30 fps
HD @30 fps |
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
5000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes 68W Flash Charging 50% in 15 minutes
|
Yes 67W Super VOOC Charging 80% in 30 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
11h 26m
|
14h 23m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
38m 15s
|
50m 47s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
UFS 2.2
|
UFS 2.2
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Yes Up to 1 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
DTS Sound
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Side
|
Side
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|