|
68%
Tecno Spark 4
₹7,999
(Discontinued)
|
68%
Xiaomi Redmi 9A
₹6,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Tecno Spark 4 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9A
Comparing the Tecno Spark 4 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9A across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Tecno Spark 4 and Xiaomi Redmi 9A run at the same processing speed of 2.0 GHz.
Display: Xiaomi Redmi 9A offers a screen size of 6.53 inches, while Tecno Spark 4 offers 6.52 inches, making Xiaomi Redmi 9A the larger display of the two. Both Tecno Spark 4 and Xiaomi Redmi 9A feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both Tecno Spark 4 and Xiaomi Redmi 9A feature a 13 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Tecno Spark 4 offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Xiaomi Redmi 9A offers 5 MP, making Tecno Spark 4 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Xiaomi Redmi 9A offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while Tecno Spark 4 offers 4000 mAh, making Xiaomi Redmi 9A better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Tecno Spark 4 and Xiaomi Redmi 9A offer the same internal storage of 32 GB.
|
✕
Tecno Spark 4
₹7,999
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Xiaomi Redmi 9A
₹6,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
68%
|
68%
|
Release Date
|
25 Sep, 2019
|
04 Sep, 2020
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
MediaTek Helio G25
|
|
Quad Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
3 GB RAM
|
2 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1560 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
|
5 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
32 GB
|
32 GB
|
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
4.2/5
(65,692 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
80,070
AnTuTu Score
|
N/A
|
|
12h 42m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
N/A
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Sep 04, 2020
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v10 (Q)
|
Custom UI
|
N/A
|
MIUI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Avg
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio A22
|
MediaTek Helio G25
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 1.5 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A53 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8300
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
RAM
|
3 GB / 4 GB
|
2 GB / 3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
N/A
|
LPDDR4X
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
80,070
|
N/A
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
25.0 s
|
N/A
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
5.0 %
|
N/A
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
12.9 %
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.52 inches (16.56 cm)
|
6.53 inches (16.59 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1560 px (HD+)
|
720x1600 px (HD+)
|
Brightness
|
N/A
|
400 nits
|
Aspect Ratio
|
20:9
|
20:9
|
Pixel Density
|
264 ppi
|
269 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
81.08 %
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Design
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 |
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.2 Wide Angle28 mm focal length 1µm pixel size |
|
2 MP
Depth Camera |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes Phase Detection autofocus
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
Settings
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
5 MP
f/2.2 Wide Angle Primary Camera1.12µm pixel size |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
N/A
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4000 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 26 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
12h 42m
|
N/A
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
3h 19m 29s
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
32 GB / 64 GB
|
32 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
eMMC 5.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 128 GB
|
Yes Up to 512 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
N/A
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.528 W/kg Body: 0.791 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v5.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
No
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|