Copy link to bookmark or share with others
ThL T200C vs PiPO T4
Comparing the ThL T200C vs PiPO T4 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: ThL T200C runs at a higher processing speed of 1.7 GHz, while PiPO T4 runs at 1.2 GHz, making ThL T200C the better performer.
Display: PiPO T4 offers a screen size of 6.5 inches, while ThL T200C offers 6 inches, making PiPO T4 the larger display of the two. PiPO T4 features a IPS LCD display compared to ThL T200C's LCD, making PiPO T4 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: ThL T200C offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while PiPO T4 offers 2 MP, making ThL T200C better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: ThL T200C offers a higher front camera resolution with 5 MP, while PiPO T4 offers 0.3 MP, making ThL T200C better for front camera photography.
Battery: PiPO T4 offers a higher battery capacity with 2600 mAh, while ThL T200C offers 2500 mAh, making PiPO T4 better for longer battery life.
Storage: PiPO T4 offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while ThL T200C offers 16 GB, making PiPO T4 the better option for storage.
Summary
Spec Score
|
62%
|
52%
|
Release Date
|
17 Feb, 2014
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6592
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
|
(upto 1.7 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
2 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.0 inches (15.24 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
2500 mAh
|
2600 mAh
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Avg
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6592
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 1.7 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-450 MP4
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
2 GB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.0 inches (15.24 cm)
|
6.5 inches (16.51 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
245 ppi
|
144 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
65.07 %
|
Design
Height
|
N/A
|
183 mm
|
Width
|
N/A
|
100.9 mm
|
Thickness
|
N/A
|
9.5 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
230 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Poor
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
2500 mAh
|
2600 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|