Videocon Starr 100
₹2,999
(Discontinued)
|
Nipda Tornado U105
₹2,997
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Videocon Starr 100 vs Nipda Tornado U105
Comparing the Videocon Starr 100 vs Nipda Tornado U105 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both Videocon Starr 100 and Nipda Tornado U105 run at the same processing speed of 1.3 GHz.
Display: Nipda Tornado U105 offers a screen size of 5.5 inches, while Videocon Starr 100 offers 4 inches, making Nipda Tornado U105 the larger display of the two. Nipda Tornado U105 features a IPS LCD display compared to Videocon Starr 100's TFT, making Nipda Tornado U105 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Nipda Tornado U105 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Videocon Starr 100 offers 5 MP, making Nipda Tornado U105 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Nipda Tornado U105 offers a higher front camera resolution with 8 MP, while Videocon Starr 100 offers 1.3 MP, making Nipda Tornado U105 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Nipda Tornado U105 offers a higher battery capacity with 2800 mAh, while Videocon Starr 100 offers 1800 mAh, making Nipda Tornado U105 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Videocon Starr 100 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Nipda Tornado U105 offers 16 GB, making Videocon Starr 100 the better option for storage.
User Rating: Videocon Starr 100 receives a higher user rating of 3.6, while Nipda Tornado U105 has a rating of 3.2.
|
✕
Videocon Starr 100
₹2,999
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Nipda Tornado U105
₹2,997
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
05 Mar, 2018
|
01 Mar, 2018
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
MediaTek MT6735
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.3 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
1.3 MP
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
1800 mAh
|
2800 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
16 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.6/5
(127 ratings)
|
3.2/5
(26 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v7.0 (Nougat)
|
Android v6.0 (Marshmallow)
|
Performance
Chipset
|
N/A
|
MediaTek MT6735
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Mali-T720 MP2
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Type
|
TFT
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
5.5 inches (13.97 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
267 ppi
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash |
Front Camera
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Battery
Capacity
|
1800 mAh
|
2800 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Quick Charging
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
16 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Micro SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Micro SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 1800(band 3) |
4G Bands: FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 800(band 20)
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
No
|
No
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|