XOLO Q1000 Opus
₹9,999
(Out of Stock)
|
54%
iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger
₹6,820
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
XOLO Q1000 Opus vs iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger
Comparing the XOLO Q1000 Opus vs iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while XOLO Q1000 Opus runs at 1.2 GHz, making iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger the better performer.
Display: XOLO Q1000 Opus offers a screen size of 5 inches, while iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger offers 4 inches, making XOLO Q1000 Opus the larger display of the two. iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger features a IPS LCD display compared to XOLO Q1000 Opus's LCD, making iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both XOLO Q1000 Opus and iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both XOLO Q1000 Opus and iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: XOLO Q1000 Opus offers a higher battery capacity with 2000 mAh, while iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger offers 1300 mAh, making XOLO Q1000 Opus better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both XOLO Q1000 Opus and iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: XOLO Q1000 Opus receives a higher user rating of 3.6, while iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger has a rating of 3.1.
|
XOLO Q1000 Opus
₹9,999
(Out of Stock)
|
iBall Andi4 IPS Tiger
₹6,820
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
54%
|
Release Date
|
29 Nov, 2013
|
23 May, 2014
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
Broadcom BCM23550
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x854 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
2000 mAh
|
1300 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.6/5
(1,077 ratings)
|
3.1/5
(50 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Nov 29, 2013
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Chipset
|
Broadcom BCM23550
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
32 bit
|
N/A
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Broadcom VideoCore IV
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
196 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
65.93 %
|
57.55 %
|
Design
Height
|
143.3 mm
|
124.5 mm
|
Width
|
72.9 mm
|
63.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.95 mm
|
10.2 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
141.8 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
HD @30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
2000 mAh
|
1300 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 11 Hours(3G) / Up to 18 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
NFC
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|