XOLO X900
₹16,406
(Discontinued)
|
Micromax A90S
₹2,797
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
XOLO X900 vs Micromax A90S
Comparing the XOLO X900 vs Micromax A90S across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: XOLO X900 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.6 GHz, while Micromax A90S runs at 1.0 GHz, making XOLO X900 the better performer.
Display: Micromax A90S offers a screen size of 4.3 inches, while XOLO X900 offers 4 inches, making Micromax A90S the larger display of the two. Micromax A90S features a Super AMOLED display compared to XOLO X900's TFT, making Micromax A90S the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both XOLO X900 and Micromax A90S feature a 8 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: XOLO X900 offers a higher front camera resolution with 1.3 MP, while Micromax A90S offers 0.3 MP, making XOLO X900 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Micromax A90S offers a higher battery capacity with 1600 mAh, while XOLO X900 offers 1460 mAh, making Micromax A90S better for longer battery life.
Storage: Micromax A90S offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while XOLO X900 offers 16 GB, making Micromax A90S the better option for storage.
User Rating: XOLO X900 and Micromax A90S both receive the same user rating of 4.2.
|
✕
XOLO X900
₹16,406
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Micromax A90S
₹2,797
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
25 Apr, 2012
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
Intel Atom
|
MediaTek
|
|
(upto 1.6 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
4 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.3 inches (10.92 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
1024x600 px (HD)
|
800x480 px (HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
1.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
1460 mAh
|
1600 mAh
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
4.2/5
(539 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(308 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v2.3 (Gingerbread)
|
Android v4 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Performance
Chipset
|
Intel Atom Z2460
|
MediaTek
|
Processor
|
1.6 GHz
|
Dual core, 1 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
PowerVR SGX 531 Ultra
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Type
|
TFT
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
4 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.3 inches (10.92 cm)
|
Resolution
|
1024x600 px (HD)
|
800x480 px (HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
217 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
58.77 %
|
61.88 %
|
Design
Height
|
123 mm
|
127.2 mm
|
Width
|
63 mm
|
66.8 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.99 mm
|
9.80 mm
|
Weight
|
127 grams
|
118.4 grams
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes
|
Yes Flash LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
|
Continuous Shooting
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Smile detection |
Digital Zoom
Smile detection |
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
Fixed Focus
|
Battery
Capacity
|
1460 mAh
|
1600 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 8 Hours(3G) / Up to 14 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 4(3G) / Up to 5(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
No
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Single SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v2.1
|
Yes v4
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
N/A
|
Accelerometer
|
Applications
|
N/A
|
TOI Mi Store Widgets Gmail Google Apps Tray
|