XOLO Q1000 Opus 2
₹5,899
(Discontinued)
|
Karbonn A93
₹4,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
XOLO Q1000 Opus 2 vs Karbonn A93
Comparing the XOLO Q1000 Opus 2 vs Karbonn A93 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Karbonn A93 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while XOLO Q1000 Opus 2 runs at 1.2 GHz, making Karbonn A93 the better performer.
Display: XOLO Q1000 Opus 2 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Karbonn A93 offers 3.9 inches, making XOLO Q1000 Opus 2 the larger display of the two. XOLO Q1000 Opus 2 features a IPS LCD display compared to Karbonn A93's LCD, making XOLO Q1000 Opus 2 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: XOLO Q1000 Opus 2 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Karbonn A93 offers 5 MP, making XOLO Q1000 Opus 2 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: XOLO Q1000 Opus 2 offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Karbonn A93 offers 0.3 MP, making XOLO Q1000 Opus 2 better for front camera photography.
Battery: XOLO Q1000 Opus 2 offers a higher battery capacity with 2000 mAh, while Karbonn A93 offers 1500 mAh, making XOLO Q1000 Opus 2 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both XOLO Q1000 Opus 2 and Karbonn A93 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Karbonn A93 receives a higher user rating of 3.5, while XOLO Q1000 Opus 2 has a rating of 2.7.
|
✕
XOLO Q1000 Opus 2
₹5,899
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Karbonn A93
₹4,990
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
19 Jun, 2014
|
20 Jun, 2014
|
Performance
|
Snapdragon 200
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
3.9 inches (9.91 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
540x960 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
2 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
2000 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
2.7/5
(22 ratings)
|
3.5/5
(32 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Jun 20, 2014
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 305
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
3.9 inches (9.91 cm)
|
Resolution
|
540x960 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
220 ppi
|
239 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
65.98 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
143 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
73 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
9.3 mm
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Capacity
|
2000 mAh
|
1500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|