XOLO Q1000
₹13,499
(Out of Stock)
|
Spice Pinnacle FHD Mi-525
₹10,990
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
XOLO Q1000 vs Spice Pinnacle FHD Mi-525
Comparing the XOLO Q1000 vs Spice Pinnacle FHD Mi-525 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Spice Pinnacle FHD Mi-525 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.5 GHz, while XOLO Q1000 runs at 1.2 GHz, making Spice Pinnacle FHD Mi-525 the better performer.
Display: Both XOLO Q1000 and Spice Pinnacle FHD Mi-525 offer the same screen size of 5 inches, but XOLO Q1000 features a IPS LCD display compared to Spice Pinnacle FHD Mi-525's TFT, making XOLO Q1000 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both XOLO Q1000 and Spice Pinnacle FHD Mi-525 feature a 8 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Spice Pinnacle FHD Mi-525 offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while XOLO Q1000 offers 1.2 MP, making Spice Pinnacle FHD Mi-525 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Both XOLO Q1000 and Spice Pinnacle FHD Mi-525 offer the same 2100 mAh battery capacity.
Storage: Spice Pinnacle FHD Mi-525 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while XOLO Q1000 offers 4 GB, making Spice Pinnacle FHD Mi-525 the better option for storage.
User Rating: XOLO Q1000 receives a higher user rating of 3.8, while Spice Pinnacle FHD Mi-525 has a rating of 3.2.
|
✕
XOLO Q1000
₹13,499
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Spice Pinnacle FHD Mi-525
₹10,990
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
08 May, 2013
|
11 Jul, 2013
|
Performance
|
MediaTek MT6589
|
MediaTek MT6589T
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.5 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
5 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
1.2 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
2100 mAh
|
2100 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(553 ratings)
|
3.2/5
(64 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
May 08, 2013
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6589
|
MediaTek MT6589T
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.5 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR SGX 544
|
PowerVR SGX 544
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
5 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
294 ppi
|
441 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
67.79 %
|
61.55 %
|
Design
Height
|
143.5 mm
|
149.4 mm
|
Width
|
70.8 mm
|
74.9 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.8 mm
|
9.3 mm
|
Weight
|
171.1 grams
|
175 grams
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary CameraCMOS image sensor Back-illuminated sensor BSI |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
Full HD @30
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
1.2 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Capacity
|
2100 mAh
|
2100 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 10.5 Hours(3G) / Up to 14 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 0.912 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Audio Features
|
N/A
|
SRS Sound
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Gyroscope
|