XOLO Q2500
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
XOLO Q2500 vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the XOLO Q2500 vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: XOLO Q2500 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Lava Iris 406q runs at 1.2 GHz, making XOLO Q2500 the better performer.
Display: XOLO Q2500 offers a screen size of 6 inches, while Lava Iris 406q offers 4 inches, making XOLO Q2500 the larger display of the two. XOLO Q2500 features a IPS LCD display compared to Lava Iris 406q's TFT, making XOLO Q2500 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: XOLO Q2500 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Lava Iris 406q offers 5 MP, making XOLO Q2500 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: XOLO Q2500 offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Lava Iris 406q offers 0.3 MP, making XOLO Q2500 better for front camera photography.
Battery: XOLO Q2500 offers a higher battery capacity with 3000 mAh, while Lava Iris 406q offers 1700 mAh, making XOLO Q2500 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both XOLO Q2500 and Lava Iris 406q offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Lava Iris 406q receives a higher user rating of 3.7, while XOLO Q2500 has a rating of 3.6.
|
XOLO Q2500
₹14,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
02 Apr, 2014
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
6.0 inches (15.24 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
2 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
3000 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.6/5
(127 ratings)
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Apr 02, 2014
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Chipset
|
MT6582
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400 MP2
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
6.0 inches (15.24 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
245 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
112.89 %
|
57.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
136 mm
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
64.6 mm
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.9 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 fps
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Capacity
|
3000 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 15 Hours(3G) / Up to 40 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|