|
55%
XOLO Q500S IPS
₹5,999
(Out of Stock)
|
52%
Huawei Ascend G520
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
XOLO Q500S IPS vs Huawei Ascend G520
Comparing the XOLO Q500S IPS vs Huawei Ascend G520 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: XOLO Q500S IPS runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while Huawei Ascend G520 runs at 1.2 GHz, making XOLO Q500S IPS the better performer.
Display: Huawei Ascend G520 offers a screen size of 4.5 inches, while XOLO Q500S IPS offers 4 inches, making Huawei Ascend G520 the larger display of the two. XOLO Q500S IPS features a IPS LCD display compared to Huawei Ascend G520's LCD, making XOLO Q500S IPS the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both XOLO Q500S IPS and Huawei Ascend G520 feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both XOLO Q500S IPS and Huawei Ascend G520 feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Huawei Ascend G520 offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while XOLO Q500S IPS offers 1500 mAh, making Huawei Ascend G520 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both XOLO Q500S IPS and Huawei Ascend G520 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
|
✕
XOLO Q500S IPS
₹5,999
(Out of Stock)
|
✕
Huawei Ascend G520
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
55%
|
52%
|
Release Date
|
11 Jul, 2014
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6582M
|
Snapdragon 200
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
1500 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.7/5
(862 ratings)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Jul 11, 2014
(Official)
|
N/A
|
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.2 (KitKat)
|
Android v4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6582M
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8225Q
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
218 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
57.59 %
|
62.14 %
|
Design
Height
|
125 mm
|
134 mm
|
Width
|
63.2 mm
|
67 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.9 mm
|
10 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
155 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
N/A
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
N/A
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Smile detection |
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1500 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 7.6 Hours(3G) / Up to 16.1 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v3.0
|
Yes v2.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|