XOLO Q900s Plus
₹6,868
(Discontinued)
|
54%
Wiio WI Star 3G
₹4,390
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
XOLO Q900s Plus vs Wiio WI Star 3G
Comparing the XOLO Q900s Plus vs Wiio WI Star 3G across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Wiio WI Star 3G runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while XOLO Q900s Plus runs at 1.2 GHz, making Wiio WI Star 3G the better performer.
Display: Wiio WI Star 3G offers a screen size of 5 inches, while XOLO Q900s Plus offers 4.7 inches, making Wiio WI Star 3G the larger display of the two. Both XOLO Q900s Plus and Wiio WI Star 3G feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: XOLO Q900s Plus offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Wiio WI Star 3G offers 5 MP, making XOLO Q900s Plus better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both XOLO Q900s Plus and Wiio WI Star 3G feature a 2 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Wiio WI Star 3G offers a higher battery capacity with 2000 mAh, while XOLO Q900s Plus offers 1800 mAh, making Wiio WI Star 3G better for longer battery life.
Storage: XOLO Q900s Plus offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Wiio WI Star 3G offers 4 GB, making XOLO Q900s Plus the better option for storage.
|
✕
XOLO Q900s Plus
₹6,868
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Wiio WI Star 3G
₹4,390
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
54%
|
Release Date
|
22 Dec, 2014
|
12 Dec, 2014
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
4.7 inches (11.94 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
480x854 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
2 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1800 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(16 ratings)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
|
MediaTek MT6572
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 302
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.7 inches (11.94 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
480x854 px
|
Pixel Density
|
312 ppi
|
196 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
66.69 %
|
61.08 %
|
Design
Height
|
135.8 mm
|
145.5 mm
|
Width
|
67.2 mm
|
77.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.2 mm
|
9.8 mm
|
Weight
|
100 grams
|
164 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection |
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1800 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 14 Hours(3G) / Up to 23 Hours(2G)
|
Up to 8 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|