Copy link to bookmark or share with others
XOLO ZX vs Lava Z93
Comparing the XOLO ZX vs Lava Z93 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both XOLO ZX and Lava Z93 run at the same processing speed of 2.0 GHz.
Display: Both XOLO ZX and Lava Z93 offer the same screen size of 6.22 inches and feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both XOLO ZX and Lava Z93 feature a 13 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: XOLO ZX offers a higher front camera resolution with 16 MP, while Lava Z93 offers 8 MP, making XOLO ZX better for front camera photography.
Battery: Lava Z93 offers a higher battery capacity with 3500 mAh, while XOLO ZX offers 3260 mAh, making Lava Z93 better for longer battery life.
Storage: XOLO ZX offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while Lava Z93 offers 32 GB, making XOLO ZX the better option for storage.
User Rating: Lava Z93 receives a higher user rating of 4.2, while XOLO ZX has a rating of 3.7.
Summary
Spec Score
|
72%
|
68%
|
Release Date
|
25 Apr, 2019
|
22 Aug, 2019
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
3 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
6.22 inches (15.8 cm)
|
6.22 inches (15.8 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
|
5 MP
Depth Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
16 MP
|
8 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
3260 mAh
|
3500 mAh
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
32 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.7/5
(402 ratings)
|
4.2/5
(55 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
79,138
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
14h 17m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Compare in 360 View
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
Apr 25, 2019
(Official)
|
Aug 22, 2019
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Avg
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
MediaTek Helio P22
|
Processor
|
Octa core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Octa core, 2 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
12 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
PowerVR GE8320
|
RAM
|
4 GB / 6 GB
|
3 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR3
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
79,138
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
20.0 s
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
6.22 inches (15.8 cm)
|
6.22 inches (15.8 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
720x1520 px (HD+)
|
Aspect Ratio
|
19:9
|
19:9
|
Pixel Density
|
270 ppi
|
270 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
81.08 %
|
81.59 %
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with notch
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Design
Height
|
157.8 mm
|
156.6 mm
|
Width
|
75.1 mm
|
75.2 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.7 mm
|
8.4 mm
|
Weight
|
160 grams
|
159.2 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.0CMOS image sensor 1.12µm pixel size |
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.81.12µm pixel size |
|
5 MP
Depth Camera |
2 MP
Depth Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual-color LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
Settings
|
ISO control
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Auto Flash
Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
Full HD @30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
16 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes Screen flash
|
Yes Soft light flash
|
Compare Camera Samples
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
3260 mAh
|
3500 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-Polymer
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 21.5 Hours(4G) / Up to 21.1 Hours(3G)
|
N/A
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
14h 17m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 46m 5s
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB / 128 GB
|
32 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) |
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.1
|
Yes v4.1
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
Rear
|
Rear
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|