|
77%
Xiaomi Mi CC9e
₹14,090
(Not Released in India)
|
81%
realme P3
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
×
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Xiaomi Mi CC9e vs realme P3
Share
Comparing the Xiaomi Mi CC9e vs realme P3 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: realme P3 runs at a higher processing speed of 2.3 GHz, while Xiaomi Mi CC9e runs at 2.0 GHz, making realme P3 the better performer.
Display: realme P3 offers a screen size of 6.67 inches, while Xiaomi Mi CC9e offers 6.08 inches, making realme P3 the larger display of the two. Both Xiaomi Mi CC9e and realme P3 feature the same AMOLED display.
Rear Camera: realme P3 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 50 MP, while Xiaomi Mi CC9e offers 48 MP, making realme P3 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Xiaomi Mi CC9e offers a higher front camera resolution with 32 MP, while realme P3 offers 16 MP, making Xiaomi Mi CC9e better for front camera photography.
Battery: realme P3 offers a higher battery capacity with 6000 mAh, while Xiaomi Mi CC9e offers 4030 mAh, making realme P3 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Xiaomi Mi CC9e offers higher internal storage with 64 GB, while realme P3 offers 128 GB, making Xiaomi Mi CC9e the better option for storage.
|
✕
Xiaomi Mi CC9e
₹14,090
(Not Released in India)
|
✕
realme P3
₹15,999
(Out of Stock)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
77%
|
81%
|
Release Date
|
27 Jan, 2020
|
19 Mar, 2025
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
Snapdragon 665
|
Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
|
|
Octa Core (upto 2 GHz)
|
Octa Core (upto 2.3 GHz)
|
|
4 GB RAM
|
6 GB RAM
|
| Snapdragon 665 vs Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | |
Display
|
|
|
|
6.08 inches (15.44 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
|
720x1560 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
|
N/A
|
120 Hz Refresh Rate
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
48 MP
Primary Camera
|
50 MP
Wide Angle Primary Camera
|
|
8 MP
Ultra-Wide Angle Camera
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
|
2 MP
Depth Camera
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
32 MP
|
16 MP
Wide Angle Lens
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
4030 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
|
Quick Charging
|
45W Fast Charging
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB
|
|
N/A
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expert Review
|
N/A
|
8.0/10
|
Pros
|
|
Cons
|
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
4.3/5
(30,349 ratings)
|
Benchmarks (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
764,410
AnTuTu Score
|
|
N/A
|
12h 44m
Battery Life (PC Mark)
|
Video
|
There are no videos available for the device.
|
|
User Feedback
General
Launch Date
|
N/A
|
Mar 19, 2025
(Official)
|
Operating System
|
Android v9.0 (Pie)
|
Android v15
|
OS Updates
|
N/A
|
2 Years
|
Security Updates
|
N/A
|
3 Years
|
Custom UI
|
MIUI
|
Realme UI
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Good
|
Very Good
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
View Details
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
View Details
|
Processor
|
Octa core
2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Kryo 260 |
Octa core
2.3 GHz, Single core, Cortex A720 2.2 GHz, Tri core, Cortex A720 1.8 GHz, Quad core, Cortex A520 |
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Fabrication (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
4 nm
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 610
|
Adreno 810
|
RAM
|
4 GB
|
6 GB / 8 GB
|
RAM Type
|
LPDDR4X
|
LPDDR4X
|
Cooling Technology
|
N/A
|
Hybrid Cooling System
|
Performance Test Results
AnTuTu Score (The higher, the better) AnTuTu benchmark measures overall performance of a phone by stress-testing CPU, GPU, RAM, etc.
|
N/A
|
764,410
|
Bootup Time (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
27.0 s
|
Gaming Test Results
Battery Drain* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
6.0 %
|
Heating* (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
22.7 %
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
AMOLED
|
AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
6.08 inches (15.44 cm)
|
6.67 inches (16.94 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1560 px (HD+)
|
1080x2400 px (FHD+)
|
Peak Brightness
|
N/A
|
2000 nits
|
Refresh Rate
|
N/A
|
120 Hz
|
Pixel Density
|
283 ppi
|
395 ppi
|
Touch Sampling Rate
|
N/A
|
180 Hz
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
82.21 %
|
87.03 %
|
Aspect Ratio
|
N/A
|
20:9
|
Screen Protection
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v5
|
N/A
|
Bezel-less Display
|
Yes with waterdrop notch
|
Yes with punch-hole display
|
Screen to Body Ratio (claimed by the brand)
|
N/A
|
92.65 %
|
Design
Height
|
153.4 mm
|
163.15 mm
|
Width
|
71.8 mm
|
75.65 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.4 mm
|
7.97 mm
|
Weight
|
173.8 grams
|
194 grams
|
Water Resistance
|
N/A
|
Yes Water resistant IP69 (up to 30 minutes in a depth of 2.5 meter)
|
Ruggedness
|
N/A
|
Dust proof
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
48 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.791/2" sensor size IMX586 Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.8µm pixel size |
50 MP
Primary Cameraf/1.8 Wide Angle 76° field-of-view27 mm focal length 1/2.88" sensor size IMX480 CMOS image sensor Exmor-RS CMOS Sensor 0.61µm pixel size |
|
8 MP
f/2.2 Ultra-Wide Angle Camera1.12µm pixel size |
2 MP
Depth Camera |
|
2 MP
f/2.4 Depth Camera1.75µm pixel size |
N/A
|
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
OIS
|
N/A
|
No
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
8000 x 6000 Pixels
|
8150 x 6150 Pixels
|
Settings
|
N/A
|
Exposure compensation ISO control
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Continuous Shooting
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
Auto Flash Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
3840x2160 @ 30 fps
1920x1080 @ 60 fps |
4k @30 fps
Full HD @120 fps HD @240 fps |
Video Recording Features
|
N/A
|
Dual Video Recording
Slow Motion |
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Resolution
|
32 MP
f/2.0 Primary Camera1.6µm pixel size |
16 MP
f/2.4 Wide Angle Primary Camera23 mm focal length 1/3.09" sensor size Exmor RS 1µm pixel size |
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
1280x720 @ 30 fps |
Full HD @30 fps
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Excellent
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
4030 mAh
|
6000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Silicon Carbon
|
Quick Charging
|
Yes Quick Charging v3.0
|
Yes 45W Fast Charging 50% in 30 minutes
|
Battery Test Results
Battery Life (PC Mark) (The higher, the better) PCMark Battery benchmark measures battery life of a phone with various activities such as web browsing, photo editing, writing, video editing, etc.
|
N/A
|
12h 44m
|
Charging Time (20% to 100%) (The lower, the better)
|
N/A
|
1h 1m
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
64 GB
|
128 GB / 256 GB
|
Storage Type
|
N/A
|
UFS 3.1
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 256 GB
|
Yes Up to 2 TB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
SIM1: Nano SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G 4G
|
VoLTE
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
View More
SIM 2
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41) / 2100(band 34) / 1900(band 39)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5) |
5G Bands: FDD N1 / N3 / N5 / N8 / N28
TDD N40 / N41 / N77 / N78 |
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40) / 2500(band 41)
FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 700(band 28) / 850(band 5) |
View More
SAR Value
|
N/A
|
Head: 1.178 W/kg Body: 0.398 W/kg
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) 5GHz
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v5.0
|
Yes v5.2
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
Yes with A-GPS Glonass
|
NFC
|
N/A
|
No
|
Multimedia
Stereo Speakers
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
USB Type-C
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Fingerprint Sensor Position
|
On-screen
|
On-screen
|
Fingerprint Sensor Type
|
Optical
|
Optical
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass Gyroscope
|