|
52%
ZTE Blade G V815W
|
Karbonn Titanium S15 Ultra
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
ZTE Blade G V815W vs Karbonn Titanium S15 Ultra
Comparing the ZTE Blade G V815W vs Karbonn Titanium S15 Ultra across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Karbonn Titanium S15 Ultra runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while ZTE Blade G V815W runs at 1.0 GHz, making Karbonn Titanium S15 Ultra the better performer.
Display: Both ZTE Blade G V815W and Karbonn Titanium S15 Ultra offer the same screen size of 4 inches, but ZTE Blade G V815W features a LCD display compared to Karbonn Titanium S15 Ultra's TFT, making ZTE Blade G V815W the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Karbonn Titanium S15 Ultra offers a higher rear camera resolution with 3.2 MP, while ZTE Blade G V815W offers 2 MP, making Karbonn Titanium S15 Ultra better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both ZTE Blade G V815W and Karbonn Titanium S15 Ultra feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Karbonn Titanium S15 Ultra offers a higher battery capacity with 1300 mAh, while ZTE Blade G V815W offers 1200 mAh, making Karbonn Titanium S15 Ultra better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both ZTE Blade G V815W and Karbonn Titanium S15 Ultra offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
|
✕
ZTE Blade G V815W
|
✕
Karbonn Titanium S15 Ultra
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
01 Jun, 2015
|
13 Jul, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
320x520 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1200 mAh
|
1300 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
3.2/5
(9 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Dual core, 1.3 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400
|
N/A
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
320x520 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
153 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
56.87 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
125 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
64 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
9.8 mm
|
N/A
|
Weight
|
120 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
2048 x 1536 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
720x480 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1200 mAh
|
1300 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v3.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|