|
54%
ZTE Blade G2
₹2,090
(Discontinued)
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
ZTE Blade G2 vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the ZTE Blade G2 vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both ZTE Blade G2 and Lava Iris 406q run at the same processing speed of 1.2 GHz.
Display: ZTE Blade G2 offers a screen size of 4.5 inches, while Lava Iris 406q offers 4 inches, making ZTE Blade G2 the larger display of the two. ZTE Blade G2 features a IPS LCD display compared to Lava Iris 406q's TFT, making ZTE Blade G2 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both ZTE Blade G2 and Lava Iris 406q feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both ZTE Blade G2 and Lava Iris 406q feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: ZTE Blade G2 offers a higher battery capacity with 2000 mAh, while Lava Iris 406q offers 1700 mAh, making ZTE Blade G2 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both ZTE Blade G2 and Lava Iris 406q offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: Lava Iris 406q receives a higher user rating of 3.7, while ZTE Blade G2 has a rating of 3.2.
|
✕
ZTE Blade G2
₹2,090
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
54%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
19 Jul, 2013
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6589
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
|
480x854 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
2000 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.2/5
(62 ratings)
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.1 (Jelly Bean)
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6589
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
PowerVR SGX 544
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
218 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
63.08 %
|
57.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
134 mm
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
66 mm
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.9 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Weight
|
145 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
2000 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
Up to 12.3 Hours(3G) / Up to 15 Hours(2G)
|
N/A
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Mini
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|