|
52%
ZTE Blade II
₹8,220
(Discontinued)
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
ZTE Blade II vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the ZTE Blade II vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lava Iris 406q runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while ZTE Blade II runs at 1.0 GHz, making Lava Iris 406q the better performer.
Display: Lava Iris 406q offers a screen size of 4 inches, while ZTE Blade II offers 3.5 inches, making Lava Iris 406q the larger display of the two. ZTE Blade II features a Super AMOLED display compared to Lava Iris 406q's TFT, making ZTE Blade II the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both ZTE Blade II and Lava Iris 406q feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both ZTE Blade II and Lava Iris 406q feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Lava Iris 406q offers a higher battery capacity with 1700 mAh, while ZTE Blade II offers 1200 mAh, making Lava Iris 406q better for longer battery life.
Storage: ZTE Blade II offers higher internal storage with 512 GB, while Lava Iris 406q offers 4 GB, making ZTE Blade II the better option for storage.
User Rating: ZTE Blade II receives a higher user rating of 5, while Lava Iris 406q has a rating of 3.7.
|
✕
ZTE Blade II
₹8,220
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
13 Mar, 2012
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Snapdragon S1
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
Super AMOLED
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1200 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
512 MB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
5/5
(2 ratings)
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v2.3.6 (Gingerbread)
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
Processor
|
1 GHz, Cortex A5
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 200
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
Super AMOLED
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
267 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
52.23 %
|
57.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
115 mm
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
58 mm
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.9 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Weight
|
117.4 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1200 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
512 MB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Single SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
SIM Type
|
SIM1: Mini
|
N/A
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v3.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|