|
50%
ZTE Blade Q1
|
63%
BLU Studio Energy 2
₹11,990
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
ZTE Blade Q1 vs BLU Studio Energy 2
Comparing the ZTE Blade Q1 vs BLU Studio Energy 2 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: BLU Studio Energy 2 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.3 GHz, while ZTE Blade Q1 runs at 1.0 GHz, making BLU Studio Energy 2 the better performer.
Display: BLU Studio Energy 2 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while ZTE Blade Q1 offers 4 inches, making BLU Studio Energy 2 the larger display of the two. BLU Studio Energy 2 features a Super AMOLED display compared to ZTE Blade Q1's TFT, making BLU Studio Energy 2 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: BLU Studio Energy 2 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while ZTE Blade Q1 offers 2 MP, making BLU Studio Energy 2 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: BLU Studio Energy 2 offers a higher front camera resolution with 5 MP, while ZTE Blade Q1 offers 0.3 MP, making BLU Studio Energy 2 better for front camera photography.
Battery: BLU Studio Energy 2 offers a higher battery capacity with 5000 mAh, while ZTE Blade Q1 offers 1400 mAh, making BLU Studio Energy 2 better for longer battery life.
Storage: ZTE Blade Q1 offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while BLU Studio Energy 2 offers 16 GB, making ZTE Blade Q1 the better option for storage.
|
✕
ZTE Blade Q1
|
✕
BLU Studio Energy 2
₹11,990
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
50%
|
63%
|
Release Date
|
13 Oct, 2015
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
MediaTek MT6735
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1.5 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
Super AMOLED
|
|
480x800 px
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
0.3 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
1400 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
16 GB
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Android v5.0 (Lollipop)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
Avg
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
MediaTek MT6735
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
64 bit
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400
|
Mali-T720 MP2
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1.5 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
Super AMOLED
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
294 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
56.2 %
|
67.06 %
|
Screen Protection
|
N/A
|
Corning Gorilla Glass v3
|
Design
Height
|
126.5 mm
|
144 mm
|
Width
|
64 mm
|
71.2 mm
|
Thickness
|
9.8 mm
|
10.1 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
176 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Poor
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
N/A
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Excellent
|
Capacity
|
1400 mAh
|
5000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
16 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 64 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
SIM 1
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: FD-LTE 2600(band 7) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 700(band 17)
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
N/A
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|