ZTE Blade V2
|
69%
OPPO U3
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
ZTE Blade V2 vs OPPO U3
Comparing the ZTE Blade V2 vs OPPO U3 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: OPPO U3 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.7 GHz, while ZTE Blade V2 runs at 1.2 GHz, making OPPO U3 the better performer.
Display: OPPO U3 offers a screen size of 5.9 inches, while ZTE Blade V2 offers 5 inches, making OPPO U3 the larger display of the two. Both ZTE Blade V2 and OPPO U3 feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: Both ZTE Blade V2 and OPPO U3 feature a 13 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Both ZTE Blade V2 and OPPO U3 feature a 5 MP primary front camera.
Battery: OPPO U3 offers a higher battery capacity with 3000 mAh, while ZTE Blade V2 offers 2400 mAh, making OPPO U3 better for longer battery life.
Storage: ZTE Blade V2 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while OPPO U3 offers 16 GB, making ZTE Blade V2 the better option for storage.
|
✕
ZTE Blade V2
|
✕
OPPO U3
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
69%
|
Release Date
|
30 Mar, 2015
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
Snapdragon 410
|
MediaTek MT6752
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 1.7 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
2 GB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5.9 inches (14.99 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
5 MP
|
5 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
2400 mAh
|
3000 mAh
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
16 GB
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
|
MediaTek MT6752
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Octa core, 1.7 GHz, Cortex A53
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
64 bit
|
64 bit
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Mali-T760 MP2
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
2 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5.9 inches (14.99 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
1080x1920 px (FULL HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
294 ppi
|
373 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
68.12 %
|
75.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
143 mm
|
156.8 mm
|
Width
|
70.7 mm
|
81 mm
|
Thickness
|
8.5 mm
|
8.0 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
195 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Good
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Camera |
13 MP
Primary Cameraf/2.0Exmor-R CMOS image sensor |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
4128 x 3096 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Touch to focus |
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
3840x2160 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Avg
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
2400 mAh
|
3000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-Polymer
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
16 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Single SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8)
|
4G Bands: TD-LTE 2300(band 40)
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) 5GHz
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|