ZTE Blade Vec 4G
|
52%
ZTE Blade G V815W
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
ZTE Blade Vec 4G vs ZTE Blade G V815W
Comparing the ZTE Blade Vec 4G vs ZTE Blade G V815W across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: ZTE Blade Vec 4G runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while ZTE Blade G V815W runs at 1.0 GHz, making ZTE Blade Vec 4G the better performer.
Display: ZTE Blade Vec 4G offers a screen size of 5 inches, while ZTE Blade G V815W offers 4 inches, making ZTE Blade Vec 4G the larger display of the two. ZTE Blade Vec 4G features a IPS LCD display compared to ZTE Blade G V815W's LCD, making ZTE Blade Vec 4G the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: ZTE Blade Vec 4G offers a higher rear camera resolution with 13 MP, while ZTE Blade G V815W offers 2 MP, making ZTE Blade Vec 4G better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: ZTE Blade Vec 4G offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while ZTE Blade G V815W offers 0.3 MP, making ZTE Blade Vec 4G better for front camera photography.
Battery: ZTE Blade Vec 4G offers a higher battery capacity with 2300 mAh, while ZTE Blade G V815W offers 1200 mAh, making ZTE Blade Vec 4G better for longer battery life.
Storage: ZTE Blade G V815W offers higher internal storage with 4 GB, while ZTE Blade Vec 4G offers 16 GB, making ZTE Blade G V815W the better option for storage.
|
✕
ZTE Blade Vec 4G
|
✕
ZTE Blade G V815W
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
52%
|
Release Date
|
17 Nov, 2014
|
01 Jun, 2015
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
Snapdragon 400
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
13 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
2 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
2300 mAh
|
1200 mAh
|
Storage
|
16 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
2.6/5
(5 ratings)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Adreno 305
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
294 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
68.75 %
|
56.87 %
|
Design
Height
|
142.3 mm
|
125 mm
|
Width
|
70.4 mm
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
7.8 mm
|
9.8 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
120 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
13 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
N/A
|
Image Resolution
|
4320 x 3240 Pixels
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Face detection Touch to focus |
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30 fps
|
720x480 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
2300 mAh
|
1200 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
16 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Single SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
5G Not Supported
|
SIM 1
|
4G Bands: FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 2600(band 7) / 900(band 8) / 800(band 20)
|
N/A
|
|
4G Speed: 50 Mbit/s ↑ 150 Mbit/s ↓ (LTE category 4)
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Wi-Fi Direct Mobile Hotspot
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes v3.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|