ZTE Kis Flex
₹3,999
(Discontinued)
|
52%
Adcom A35
₹1,490
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
ZTE Kis Flex vs Adcom A35
Comparing the ZTE Kis Flex vs Adcom A35 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Adcom A35 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while ZTE Kis Flex runs at 1.0 GHz, making Adcom A35 the better performer.
Display: Both ZTE Kis Flex and Adcom A35 offer the same screen size of 3.5 inches, but Adcom A35 features a LCD display compared to ZTE Kis Flex's TFT, making Adcom A35 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both ZTE Kis Flex and Adcom A35 feature a 2 MP primary rear camera.
Battery: Adcom A35 offers a higher battery capacity with 1400 mAh, while ZTE Kis Flex offers 1200 mAh, making Adcom A35 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both ZTE Kis Flex and Adcom A35 offer the same internal storage of 512 GB.
User Rating: ZTE Kis Flex receives a higher user rating of 3.2, while Adcom A35 has a rating of 2.7.
|
✕
ZTE Kis Flex
₹3,999
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Adcom A35
₹1,490
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
52%
|
Release Date
|
19 Jul, 2013
|
30 Sep, 2014
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
256 MB RAM
|
256 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
|
240x320 px
|
320x480 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
1.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
1200 mAh
|
1400 mAh
|
Storage
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
User Ratings
|
3.2/5
(17 ratings)
|
2.7/5
(32 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v2.3 (Gingerbread)
|
Android v4.4.2 (KitKat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
N/A
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
Processor
|
1 GHz
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz, ARM Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
256 MB
|
256 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
TFT
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
Resolution
|
240x320 px
|
320x480 px
|
Pixel Density
|
114 ppi
|
165 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
51.81 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
116.3 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
63 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
11.5 mm
|
N/A
|
Weight
|
117 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
N/A
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
N/A
|
1.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1200 mAh
|
1400 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
N/A
|
Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|