|
56%
Zopo ZP900S Leader
|
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
Zopo ZP900S Leader vs Lava Iris 406q
Comparing the Zopo ZP900S Leader vs Lava Iris 406q across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Lava Iris 406q runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Zopo ZP900S Leader runs at 1.0 GHz, making Lava Iris 406q the better performer.
Display: Zopo ZP900S Leader offers a screen size of 5.3 inches, while Lava Iris 406q offers 4 inches, making Zopo ZP900S Leader the larger display of the two. Zopo ZP900S Leader features a LCD display compared to Lava Iris 406q's TFT, making Zopo ZP900S Leader the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Both Zopo ZP900S Leader and Lava Iris 406q feature a 5 MP primary rear camera.
Front Camera: Zopo ZP900S Leader offers a higher front camera resolution with 2 MP, while Lava Iris 406q offers 0.3 MP, making Zopo ZP900S Leader better for front camera photography.
Battery: Zopo ZP900S Leader offers a higher battery capacity with 2300 mAh, while Lava Iris 406q offers 1700 mAh, making Zopo ZP900S Leader better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both Zopo ZP900S Leader and Lava Iris 406q offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
|
✕
Zopo ZP900S Leader
|
✕
Lava Iris 406q
₹5,299
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
56%
|
N/A
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
MediaTek MT6577
|
HiSilicon Kirin
|
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
5.3 inches (13.46 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
|
960x540 px (HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
2 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
2300 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
|
N/A
|
No Wireless Charging
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
N/A
|
3.7/5
(1,169 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Android v4.3 (Jelly Bean)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6577
|
HiSilicon Kirin MSM8610
|
Processor
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, Cortext A9
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Adreno 302
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
5.3 inches (13.46 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
960x540 px (HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
208 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
66.32 %
|
57.38 %
|
Design
Height
|
149.6 mm
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
78 mm
|
64 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.20 mm
|
10.3 mm
|
Weight
|
198.2 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera4x Digital Zoom |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
Continuous Shooting
|
High Dynamic Range mode (HDR)
Burst mode |
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
Smile detection |
4 x Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1920x1080 @ 30
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
2 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
2300 mAh
|
1700 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 64 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v3
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
N/A
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
N/A
|
No
|
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer Compass
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Applications
|
Google Maps Google Talk Google Mail Google Calendar
|
N/A
|