|
58%
i-smart IS 50i Mercury V3
₹4,950
(Discontinued)
|
55%
M-Horse One A9
₹2,553
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
i-smart IS 50i Mercury V3 vs M-Horse One A9
Comparing the i-smart IS 50i Mercury V3 vs M-Horse One A9 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Both i-smart IS 50i Mercury V3 and M-Horse One A9 run at the same processing speed of 1.3 GHz.
Display: Both i-smart IS 50i Mercury V3 and M-Horse One A9 offer the same screen size of 5 inches and feature the same IPS LCD display.
Rear Camera: i-smart IS 50i Mercury V3 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while M-Horse One A9 offers 5 MP, making i-smart IS 50i Mercury V3 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: i-smart IS 50i Mercury V3 offers a higher front camera resolution with 3.2 MP, while M-Horse One A9 offers 2 MP, making i-smart IS 50i Mercury V3 better for front camera photography.
Battery: i-smart IS 50i Mercury V3 offers a higher battery capacity with 1800 mAh, while M-Horse One A9 offers 1600 mAh, making i-smart IS 50i Mercury V3 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both i-smart IS 50i Mercury V3 and M-Horse One A9 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: i-smart IS 50i Mercury V3 receives a higher user rating of 3.5, while M-Horse One A9 has a rating of 2.6.
|
✕
i-smart IS 50i Mercury V3
₹4,950
(Discontinued)
|
✕
M-Horse One A9
₹2,553
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
58%
|
55%
|
Release Date
|
24 Jun, 2015
|
09 Feb, 2016
|
Performance
|
|
|
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
MediaTek MT6582M
|
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
(upto 1.3 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x854 px
|
540x960 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
|
|
|
3.2 MP
|
2 MP
|
Battery
|
|
|
|
1800 mAh
|
1600 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.5/5
(24 ratings)
|
2.6/5
(33 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Below Avg
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
MediaTek MT6582
|
MediaTek MT6582M
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Quad core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Architecture (The higher, the better)
|
N/A
|
32 bit
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
Mali-400
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Excellent
|
Excellent
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x854 px
|
540x960 px
|
Pixel Density
|
196 ppi
|
220 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
66.11 %
|
N/A
|
Design
Height
|
144.7 mm
|
N/A
|
Width
|
72 mm
|
N/A
|
Thickness
|
8.5 mm
|
N/A
|
Weight
|
150 grams
|
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
1280x720 @ 30 fps
|
N/A
|
Front Camera
Front Camera Rating
|
Avg
|
Below Avg
|
Resolution
|
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
1800 mAh
|
1600 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 64 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|