iBall Andi 4.5h
₹9,250
(Discontinued)
|
ZTE Avid 4G
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
iBall Andi 4.5h vs ZTE Avid 4G
Comparing the iBall Andi 4.5h vs ZTE Avid 4G across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: ZTE Avid 4G runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while iBall Andi 4.5h runs at 1.0 GHz, making ZTE Avid 4G the better performer.
Display: iBall Andi 4.5h offers a screen size of 4.5 inches, while ZTE Avid 4G offers 4 inches, making iBall Andi 4.5h the larger display of the two. iBall Andi 4.5h features a IPS LCD display compared to ZTE Avid 4G's LCD, making iBall Andi 4.5h the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: iBall Andi 4.5h offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while ZTE Avid 4G offers 5 MP, making iBall Andi 4.5h better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both iBall Andi 4.5h and ZTE Avid 4G feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: ZTE Avid 4G offers a higher battery capacity with 1730 mAh, while iBall Andi 4.5h offers 1600 mAh, making ZTE Avid 4G better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both iBall Andi 4.5h and ZTE Avid 4G offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: ZTE Avid 4G receives a higher user rating of 5, while iBall Andi 4.5h has a rating of 3.8.
|
✕
iBall Andi 4.5h
₹9,250
(Discontinued)
|
✕
ZTE Avid 4G
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Release Date
|
17 Dec, 2012
|
20 Dec, 2012
|
Performance
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
|
1 GB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
4 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
|
960x540 px (HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
1600 mAh
|
1730 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(150 ratings)
|
5/5
(2 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Android v4 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
|
Performance
Processor
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, Cortex A9
|
Dual core, 1.2 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Adreno 225
|
RAM
|
1 GB
|
512 MB
|
RAM Type
|
DDR3
|
N/A
|
Display
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.5 inches (11.43 cm)
|
4 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
960x540 px (HD)
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
245 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
68.55 %
|
56.02 %
|
Design
Height
|
125 mm
|
124 mm
|
Width
|
65 mm
|
65.5 mm
|
Thickness
|
10.6 mm
|
11.90 mm
|
Weight
|
126 grams
|
148.8 grams
|
Build Material
|
Frame: Plastic
Back: Plastic |
N/A
|
Rear Camera
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
5 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
Shooting Modes
|
N/A
|
Continuous Shooting
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
Smile detection |
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Camera Features
|
Fixed Focus
|
Fixed Focus
|
Battery
Capacity
|
1600 mAh
|
1730 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-ion
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 4(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Single SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported 4G
|
SIM 1
|
N/A
|
4G Bands: FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1700(band 4)
|
SAR Value
|
Head: 0.43 W/kg
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 3 (802.11 b/g)
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
N/A
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
N/A
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|