iBall Andi 5U Platino
₹5,500
(Discontinued)
|
50%
Panasonic Love T10
₹1,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
iBall Andi 5U Platino vs Panasonic Love T10
Comparing the iBall Andi 5U Platino vs Panasonic Love T10 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: iBall Andi 5U Platino runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Panasonic Love T10 runs at 1.0 GHz, making iBall Andi 5U Platino the better performer.
Display: iBall Andi 5U Platino offers a screen size of 5 inches, while Panasonic Love T10 offers 3.5 inches, making iBall Andi 5U Platino the larger display of the two. iBall Andi 5U Platino features a IPS LCD display compared to Panasonic Love T10's TFT, making iBall Andi 5U Platino the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: iBall Andi 5U Platino offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while Panasonic Love T10 offers 2 MP, making iBall Andi 5U Platino better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both iBall Andi 5U Platino and Panasonic Love T10 feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: iBall Andi 5U Platino offers a higher battery capacity with 2000 mAh, while Panasonic Love T10 offers 1400 mAh, making iBall Andi 5U Platino better for longer battery life.
Storage: iBall Andi 5U Platino offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while Panasonic Love T10 offers 4 GB, making iBall Andi 5U Platino the better option for storage.
User Rating: Panasonic Love T10 receives a higher user rating of 3.5, while iBall Andi 5U Platino has a rating of 3.4.
|
✕
iBall Andi 5U Platino
₹5,500
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Panasonic Love T10
₹1,999
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
N/A
|
50%
|
Release Date
|
12 Aug, 2015
|
03 Aug, 2015
|
Performance
|
N/A
|
|
|
N/A
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
|
Quad Core (upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
N/A
|
|
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
|
540x960 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
N/A
|
|
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
N/A
|
|
|
2000 mAh
|
1400 mAh
|
|
No Wireless Charging
|
N/A
|
Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.4/5
(130 ratings)
|
3.5/5
(402 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Chipset
|
N/A
|
MediaTek MT6572M
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Dual core, 1 GHz, Cortex A7
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Display Type
|
IPS LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
3.5 inches (8.89 cm)
|
Resolution
|
540x960 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
220 ppi
|
267 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
50.12 %
|
Design
Height
|
N/A
|
112.2 mm
|
Width
|
N/A
|
62 mm
|
Thickness
|
N/A
|
11.9 mm
|
Weight
|
N/A
|
100 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
N/A
|
Poor
|
Resolution
|
8 MP
Primary Camera |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
Yes
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
N/A
|
Image Resolution
|
N/A
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Autofocus
|
No
|
N/A
|
Flash
|
No
|
N/A
|
Battery
Battery Rating
|
N/A
|
Very Good
|
Capacity
|
2000 mAh
|
1400 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
8 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Wi-Fi Direct
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v4.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes with A-GPS
|
Yes
|
NFC
|
No
|
N/A
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Fingerprint Sensor
|
No
|
N/A
|
Other Sensors
|
Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Accelerometer
|