|
52%
iBall Andi 4L Pulse
₹3,499
(Discontinued)
|
Celkon Millennia OCTA510
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
iBall Andi 4L Pulse vs Celkon Millennia OCTA510
Comparing the iBall Andi 4L Pulse vs Celkon Millennia OCTA510 across performance, display, camera, battery and storage to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: Celkon Millennia OCTA510 runs at a higher processing speed of 1.4 GHz, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse runs at 1.2 GHz, making Celkon Millennia OCTA510 the better performer.
Display: Celkon Millennia OCTA510 offers a screen size of 5 inches, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse offers 4 inches, making Celkon Millennia OCTA510 the larger display of the two. Celkon Millennia OCTA510 features a IPS LCD display compared to iBall Andi 4L Pulse's LCD, making Celkon Millennia OCTA510 the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: Celkon Millennia OCTA510 offers a higher rear camera resolution with 8 MP, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse offers 5 MP, making Celkon Millennia OCTA510 better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Celkon Millennia OCTA510 offers a higher front camera resolution with 3.2 MP, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse offers 0.3 MP, making Celkon Millennia OCTA510 better for front camera photography.
Battery: Celkon Millennia OCTA510 offers a higher battery capacity with 2000 mAh, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse offers 1500 mAh, making Celkon Millennia OCTA510 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Celkon Millennia OCTA510 offers higher internal storage with 8 GB, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse offers 4 GB, making Celkon Millennia OCTA510 the better option for storage.
|
✕
iBall Andi 4L Pulse
₹3,499
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Celkon Millennia OCTA510
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
05 Jan, 2015
|
09 Jan, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
MediaTek MT6592
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
Tru-Octa Core (upto 1.4 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
1 GB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
|
480x800 px
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
8 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
3.2 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1500 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(114 ratings)
|
N/A
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Android v4.4 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200
|
MediaTek MT6592
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Octa core, 1.4 GHz
|
Graphics (GPU)
|
N/A
|
Mali-400
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
1 GB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
IPS LCD
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
5.0 inches (12.7 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
720x1280 px (HD)
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
294 ppi
|
Screen to Body Ratio (calculated)
|
N/A
|
67.6 %
|
Design
Height
|
N/A
|
143.5 mm
|
Width
|
N/A
|
71 mm
|
Thickness
|
N/A
|
9.1 mm
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
8 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes Dual LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
3264 x 2448 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Video Recording
|
N/A
|
1280x720 fps
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
3.2 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1500 mAh
|
2000 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
8 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Wi-Fi Features
|
N/A
|
Mobile Hotspot
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v3.0
|
Yes v4.0
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|