|
52%
iBall Andi 4L Pulse
₹3,499
(Discontinued)
|
Onida i407
₹3,099
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Copy link to bookmark or share with others
iBall Andi 4L Pulse vs Onida i407
Comparing the iBall Andi 4L Pulse vs Onida i407 across performance, display, camera, battery, storage and user rating to help determine the better smartphone.
Here is the summary of the results:
Performance: iBall Andi 4L Pulse runs at a higher processing speed of 1.2 GHz, while Onida i407 runs at 1.0 GHz, making iBall Andi 4L Pulse the better performer.
Display: Both iBall Andi 4L Pulse and Onida i407 offer the same screen size of 4 inches, but iBall Andi 4L Pulse features a LCD display compared to Onida i407's TFT, making iBall Andi 4L Pulse the better display of the two.
Rear Camera: iBall Andi 4L Pulse offers a higher rear camera resolution with 5 MP, while Onida i407 offers 2 MP, making iBall Andi 4L Pulse better for rear camera photography.
Front Camera: Both iBall Andi 4L Pulse and Onida i407 feature a 0.3 MP primary front camera.
Battery: Onida i407 offers a higher battery capacity with 1600 mAh, while iBall Andi 4L Pulse offers 1500 mAh, making Onida i407 better for longer battery life.
Storage: Both iBall Andi 4L Pulse and Onida i407 offer the same internal storage of 4 GB.
User Rating: iBall Andi 4L Pulse receives a higher user rating of 3.8, while Onida i407 has a rating of 3.5.
|
✕
iBall Andi 4L Pulse
₹3,499
(Discontinued)
|
✕
Onida i407
₹3,099
(Discontinued)
|
Add to Compare
|
Summary
Spec Score
|
52%
|
N/A
|
Release Date
|
05 Jan, 2015
|
13 Jan, 2015
|
Performance
|
|
N/A
|
|
Snapdragon 200
|
N/A
|
|
(upto 1.2 GHz)
|
(upto 1 GHz)
|
|
512 MB RAM
|
512 MB RAM
|
Display
|
|
N/A
|
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Rear Camera
|
|
N/A
|
|
5 MP
Primary Camera
|
2 MP
Primary Camera
|
Front Camera
|
0.3 MP
|
0.3 MP
|
Battery
|
|
N/A
|
|
1500 mAh
|
1600 mAh
|
Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
User Ratings
|
3.8/5
(114 ratings)
|
3.5/5
(14 ratings)
|
User Feedback
General
Operating System
|
Windows Phone v8.1
|
Android v4.4.2 (Kitkat)
|
Performance
Performance Rating
|
Poor
|
N/A
|
Chipset
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200
|
N/A
|
Processor
|
Quad core, 1.2 GHz
|
Single core, 1 GHz
|
RAM
|
512 MB
|
512 MB
|
Display
Display Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Display Type
|
LCD
|
TFT
|
Screen Size
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
4.0 inches (10.16 cm)
|
Resolution
|
480x800 px
|
480x800 px
|
Pixel Density
|
233 ppi
|
233 ppi
|
Design
Weight
|
N/A
|
110 grams
|
Rear Camera
Rear Camera Rating
|
Below Avg
|
N/A
|
Resolution
|
5 MP
Primary CameraBack-illuminated sensor BSI |
2 MP
Primary Camera |
Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Yes LED Flash
|
Image Resolution
|
2592 x 1944 Pixels
|
1600 x 1200 Pixels
|
Camera Features
|
Digital Zoom
|
Digital Zoom
|
Front Camera
Resolution
|
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
0.3 MP
Primary Camera |
Battery
Battery Rating
|
Very Good
|
N/A
|
Capacity
|
1500 mAh
|
1600 mAh
|
Battery Type
|
Li-Polymer
|
Li-ion
|
TalkTime
|
N/A
|
Up to 4 Hours(2G)
|
Storage
Internal Storage
|
4 GB
|
4 GB
|
Expandable Storage
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Yes Up to 32 GB
|
Network & Connectivity
SIM Slot(s)
|
Dual SIM
|
Dual SIM
|
Network Support
|
5G Not Supported
|
5G Not Supported
|
Wi-Fi
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Yes Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n)
|
Bluetooth
|
Yes v3.0
|
Yes
|
GPS
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Multimedia
Audio Jack
|
3.5 mm
|
3.5 mm
|
Sensors
Other Sensors
|
Light sensor Proximity sensor Accelerometer
|
Accelerometer
|